Re: Testing automake on Cygwin 1.7

2011-11-28 Thread Peter Rosin
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2011-11-28 20:43: > On Monday 28 November 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Regarding the commit message for the 2/2 patch, the trouble with >> the double leading slash is not Cygwin specific, but instead a >> run-of-the-mill POSIX violation. >> >> A leading double slash is the ke

Re: Testing automake on Cygwin 1.7

2011-11-28 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Eric. On Monday 28 November 2011, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/25/2011 12:00 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > > >> Second is txinfo21, which stumbles because the directory timestamp > >> is not properly updated when a file changes inside the dir. > > POSIX permits, but does not require, a direct

Re: Testing automake on Cygwin 1.7

2011-11-28 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 28 November 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: > Stefano Lattarini skrev 2011-11-26 19:11: > > > > I propose to substitute the first patch with the attached one > > instead. Peter, if you have time, could you test if it works > > correctly on Cygwin? > > Oh crap, crap crap. It looks like I've be

Re: Testing automake on Cygwin 1.7

2011-11-28 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/25/2011 12:00 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > >> Second is txinfo21, which stumbles because the directory timestamp >> is not properly updated when a file changes inside the dir. POSIX permits, but does not require, a directory's timestamp to change just because a file in that directory was

Re: Testing automake on Cygwin 1.7

2011-11-28 Thread Peter Rosin
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2011-11-26 19:11: > On Saturday 26 November 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> >> Attached are the two patches I had promised. I'll wait 72 hours or your >> ACK (whichever comes first) before pushing. >> >> Regards, >> Stefano >> > Hmm... on a second thought, the check i