Re: [PATCH] {maint} remake: behave better with non-GNU make in subdirectories

Den 2011-05-29 19:32 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > Hi Peter, thanks for the review. I wouldn't call it review, it was more of a knee-jerk reaction (and I haven't even read the actual patch). > On Sunday 29 May 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Den 2011-05-29 16:26 skrev Stefano Lattarini: >>> Currently, e

Re: [PATCHES] {maint} honour configure-time AUTOCONF and AUTOM4TE (was: Re: make check failures)

Awesome. Thanks Stefano. I will try it this morning (CST) and report back. Graham Sent from my iPhone On May 29, 2011, at 5:51 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > [Adding automake-patches] > > On Saturday 28 May 2011, Graham Reitz wrote: >> Hi Stefano, >> >> Did you have a chance to take a

Re: [PATCH] {maint} remake: behave better with non-GNU make in subdirectories

Hi Peter, thanks for the review. On Sunday 29 May 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2011-05-29 16:26 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > > Currently, every decent non-GNU make program makes it possible > > to remake out-of-date autotools-generated files with a simple > > "make Makefile" issued from the top-le

Re: [PATCH] {maint} remake: behave better with non-GNU make in subdirectories

Den 2011-05-29 16:26 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > Currently, every decent non-GNU make program makes it possible > to remake out-of-date autotools-generated files with a simple > "make Makefile" issued from the top-level directory. And while > having to run "make Makefile" by hand isn't as convenien

[FYI] {testsuite-work} tests: don't require gfortran if any fortran compiler is enough

* tests/silentf90.test ($required): Require `fortran', not `gfortran'. * tests/silentf77.test ($required): Require `fortran77', not `gfortran'. * tests/silent-many-generic.test ($required): Require `fortran' and `fortran77' rather than `gfortran'. --- ChangeLog | 10

[FYI] {testsuite-work} tests: improve `ccnoco*.test', better cross-compiling support

* tests/ccnoco3.test (Mycomp): Use the `$CC' chosen by `tests/defs' instead of forcing `gcc' unconditionally. This ensures better coverage in case of cross-compiling, when GCC can be named e.g., `i586-mingw32msvc-gcc', instead of simply `gcc'. * tests/ccnoco.test: Likewise. Remove redundant check

[PATCH] {maint} remake: behave better with non-GNU make in subdirectories

Currently, every decent non-GNU make program makes it possible to remake out-of-date autotools-generated files with a simple "make Makefile" issued from the top-level directory. And while having to run "make Makefile" by hand isn't as convenient as the GNU make feature of "automatic remake *and re

[PATCHES] {maint} honour configure-time AUTOCONF and AUTOM4TE (was: Re: make check failures)

[Adding automake-patches] On Saturday 28 May 2011, Graham Reitz wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > Did you have a chance to take a look at the config and test logs? > (they are attached) > > I've been trying to figure it out without much success. > I think I've found the problem: the `aclocal.in' and `auto