* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 07:40:17PM CEST:
> This problem indicates that `git --dry-run' is not enough for me to
> check the correctness of the push; do you know if there is a way to
> show which commits are added to which branches during a push
> (while still in `dry-run'
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:49:37PM CEST:
> > On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > FWIW, somehow you managed to apply these two patches separately
> > > to each of these branches, instead of merging th
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:49:37PM CEST:
> On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > FWIW, somehow you managed to apply these two patches separately to
> > each of these branches, instead of merging them all from maint.
> Ouch, that's true... how could this be
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:14:03PM CEST:
> > Applied to maint, merged in master and branch-1.11, and pushed.
>
> FWIW, somehow you managed to apply these two patches separately to
> each of these branches, instead of me
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:05:20PM CEST:
> > --- a/m4/init.m4
> > +++ b/m4/init.m4
> >
> > @@ -70,10 +70,22 @@ _AM_IF_OPTION([no-define],,
> >
> > # Some tools Automake needs.
> > AC_REQUIRE([AM_SANITY_CHECK])dnl
> >
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:00:46PM CEST:
> > On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > What is the actual problem by the way?
> >
> > Basically, `missing --run /abs/path/to/autoconf' does not
> > recogniz
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:00:46PM CEST:
> On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > What is the actual problem by the way?
> Basically, `missing --run /abs/path/to/autoconf' does not recognize
> the program being run as an "autoconf":
Why not adjust `missing
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:57:04PM CEST:
> > * tests/missing.test: Build and use our own `autoconf' script, to
> > avoid spurious failures due to configure-time value of $AUTOCONF
> > being an absolute p
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> you don't make it easy to catch up with you! :-O
>
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:54:52PM CEST:
> > * tests/remake0.test: New test.
> > * tests/Makefile.am (TESTS): Updated.
>
> OK with ...
>
> > --- /
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:14:03PM CEST:
>
> Applied to maint, merged in master and branch-1.11, and pushed.
FWIW, somehow you managed to apply these two patches separately to each
of these branches, instead of merging them all from maint.
I'm fixing the merges with the
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:57:04PM CEST:
> * tests/missing.test: Build and use our own `autoconf' script, to
> avoid spurious failures due to configure-time value of $AUTOCONF
> being an absolute path. Prefer passing overrides to ./configure
> on the command
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:05:20PM CEST:
> --- a/m4/init.m4
> +++ b/m4/init.m4
> @@ -70,10 +70,22 @@ _AM_IF_OPTION([no-define],,
> # Some tools Automake needs.
> AC_REQUIRE([AM_SANITY_CHECK])dnl
> AC_REQUIRE([AC_ARG_PROGRAM])dnl
> +dnl We pass the the $AUTOCONF and $AU
Hi Stefano,
you don't make it easy to catch up with you! :-O
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:54:52PM CEST:
> * tests/remake0.test: New test.
> * tests/Makefile.am (TESTS): Updated.
OK with ...
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/remake0.test
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +# Make sure th
13 matches
Mail list logo
