On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:00:46PM CEST: > > On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > What is the actual problem by the way? > > > > Basically, `missing --run /abs/path/to/autoconf' does not > > recognize > > > the program being run as an "autoconf": > Why not adjust `missing' instead? Because IMHO it's not broken: if the user passes an absolute path to it, then he should know such a path points to a correct utility. Really, The only bug I see here is in the hack used by the testcase (hack that I removed in a later commit in the series, BTW).
Regards, Stefano