Hello Ralf,
I'll address PR 492 in its thread, lest the mixup of threads and topics
be un-disentangle-able. ;-)
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 06:49:30AM CEST:
> > >
> > > Yes, but ... with a simple testcase, I get this warning:
> > [...]
> > > With my real world test case, I do
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 21:42 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> [ moving from automake to -patches, and reordering; this is
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2006-10/msg00031.html ]
>
> * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:09:30AM CEST:
> > > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin
[ moving from automake to -patches, and reordering; this is
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2006-10/msg00031.html ]
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:09:30AM CEST:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=automake&pr=492
> Thank
Hello Geoffrey,
Apologies for the delay.
* Geoffrey Keating wrote on Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:49:05AM CEST:
> Sometimes, a target has a multilib which doesn't actually work on
> host for that target.
> So, I'd like to put in this patch, which adds a little code to
> AM_MULTILIB to make non-defaul
Hello Ralf,
> Thanks for the test suggestion and patches. Below is a combined patch,
> with the documentation completed and reformulated a bit. OK to install?
Yes, it's all fine. Your doc wording is better than mine.
The only thing I don't understand is a comment in the test:
"po/ is required,
