Hi Paul,
* Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, May 19, 2006 at 11:33:51PM CEST:
> That looks good to me, except let's not remove this comment:
>
> > -# The usefulness of this macro is questionable, as I can't really see
> > -# why anyone would use it. The only reason I include it is for
> > -# completenes
That looks good to me, except let's not remove this comment:
> -# The usefulness of this macro is questionable, as I can't really see
> -# why anyone would use it. The only reason I include it is for
> -# completeness, since a similar test exists for the C compiler.
> I actually don't know whe
[ this is just FYI for automake-patches ]
Automake needs some beef for better subdir-objects support.
For C and C++, it works pretty decently already, but for other
languages, it is lacking some support, notably bug reports for
Assembler, Fortran have been seen.
Also, there are C++ compilers ou
Hello Akim,
* Akim Demaille wrote on Fri, May 19, 2006 at 03:16:08PM CEST:
>
> I have a Makefile snippet which is part of a directory which I ship as
> is (EXTRA_DIST) in my tarballs (something comparable to gnulib if you
> wish). I include this Makefile snippet elsewhere, and as a result,
> Aut
