That looks good to me, except let's not remove this comment: > -# The usefulness of this macro is questionable, as I can't really see > -# why anyone would use it. The only reason I include it is for > -# completeness, since a similar test exists for the C compiler.
> I actually don't know whether there exists a losing > Fortran compiler outside of the Cray-Cyber museum, but if Automake > is going to use the macros, it's IMHO not suitable to suggest that > Autoconf could remove them. Welllll, strictly speaking, the comment doesn't suggest that Autoconf could remove the macro. Autoconf could turn it into a backward-compatibility no-op, for example.
