* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 06:46:24AM CET:
> * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:28:14AM CET:
> > Let's write "$MAKE && exit 1" because that's what of the other test do, and
> > I'm wary that some shell will return the $? of $MAKE if it fails, in turn
> > ca
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:28:14AM CET:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The extra test look useful even without this point, so please go
> ahead and check them.
Thanks. Applied with your comments addressed.
> RW> + sleep 1
>
> Just us
Bonjour Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 08:10:33AM CET:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RW> * aclocal.in (write_aclocal): Unlink `aclocal.m4' before
> RW> writing into it, to break a symlinked file.
> RW> * tests/acloca20.test: New te
>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
adl> Originally, I wanted AM_SUBST_IGNORE to cause Automake to ignore
adl> a previously defined AC_SUBST, so you could have
adl> AC_SUBST([foo])
adl> and later, perhaps outside the macro that defines 'foo' if it's
adl> not
