Re: [PRQ#73855] Merge Request for openvpn-update-systemd-resolved

2025-06-10 Thread alphalynx
> I personally would not rename to update-systemd-resolved because this script > is really specific to openvpn. Having openvpn in the name makes it easier for > people to find it in relation to openvpn packages they might already have, > easier to find, etc. Good point, I guess the counter-argum

Re: [PRQ#73855] Merge Request for openvpn-update-systemd-resolved

2025-06-10 Thread alphalynx
Hi Rubin, cc'd you on this thread for your information since you opened an orphan request (PRQ#73762)[1] and if you have any thoughts on this merge. > I believe this package should be renamed to update-systemd-resolved to > align with upstream name. I'd like to mention that the Arch wiki says "F

Re: [PRQ#73855] Merge Request for openvpn-update-systemd-resolved

2025-06-10 Thread Rubin
Hi, I personally would not rename to update-systemd-resolved because this script *is* really specific to openvpn. Having openvpn in the name makes it easier for people to find it in relation to openvpn packages they might already have, easier to find, etc. That said, I don't have a horse in the

Re: [PRQ#73855] Merge Request for openvpn-update-systemd-resolved

2025-06-09 Thread alphalynx
Hi Rubin, cc'd you on this thread for your information since you opened an orphan request (PRQ#73762)[1] and if you have any thoughts on this merge. > I believe this package should be renamed to update-systemd-resolved to > align with upstream name. I'd like to mention that the Arch wiki says "F