not...@aur.archlinux.org writes:
I didn't have time to answer the request (fine by me).
But I want to clarify a few points.
> Request #47937 has been Accepted by gromit [1]:
>
> Disowning because:
> a) upstream maintainer offered to take over (PRQ#47937)
> b) package was not properly maintained
Yes, this package should be handed over to upstream maintainer (@post-factum,
aka 'pf').
So far this package has been very rarely maintained and updated, and also it
has used Thaodan's own personal fork of linux-pf, not the original upstream
version.
@Thaodan, if you want to continue maintaini
