not...@aur.archlinux.org writes: I didn't have time to answer the request (fine by me).
But I want to clarify a few points. > Request #47937 has been Accepted by gromit [1]: > > Disowning because: > a) upstream maintainer offered to take over (PRQ#47937) > b) package was not properly maintained before Yes I didn't keep up with the releases, I should have updated the status of the package earlier or disowned earlier. > c) package is currently not out of date and does build unexpected > sources (fork instead of upstream) The package didn't build a fork, it used the upstream sources plus patches such as applied Linux stable patches earlier than the upstream. In addition I restored the patch status of the kernel, the upstream removes the patch status.
