Re: [PRQ#69725] Deletion Request for kubectl-bin

2025-02-11 Thread Vitalii Kuzhdin
Greetings, The reason I submitted multiple requests was to have unique PRQs (see the subject of the automated email) assigned to each, so that there is a precedent for a Package Maintainer action. Please don't consider it as spam; I wasn't trying to flood your inbox. I'll leave a few more of my p

Re: [PRQ#69725] Deletion Request for kubectl-bin

2025-02-11 Thread GeorgeRaven
Hey Vitalii, I understand different cultures or customs approach these things differently, however I am culturally British, and I found your opening language in your package comments needlessly combative. I appreciate and accept your apology, however I still contest this deletion request, this

Re: [PRQ#69725] Deletion Request for kubectl-bin

2025-02-11 Thread GeorgeRaven
Hey, This user has spuriously opened a deletion request for this and a few other multi-arch packages I manage for Kubernetes, namely: - kubectl-bin - kubeadm-bin - kubelet-bin - cni-plugins-bin While they do not see the value in multi-arch packages which extend beyond upstream support, I do no

[PRQ#69725] Deletion Request for kubectl-bin Rejected

2025-02-10 Thread notify
Request #69725 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: prebuilt binary packages are allowed [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/

[PRQ#69725] Deletion Request for kubectl-bin

2025-02-10 Thread notify
vitaliikuzhdin [1] filed a deletion request for kubectl-bin [2]: Already exists in the official repositories. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/vitaliikuzhdin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kubectl-bin/