Greetings, The reason I submitted multiple requests was to have unique PRQs (see the subject of the automated email) assigned to each, so that there is a precedent for a Package Maintainer action. Please don't consider it as spam; I wasn't trying to flood your inbox.
I'll leave a few more of my points in the comments, though obviously, the decision will be made by a Package Maintainer. However, the ultimate reason why I'm writing this email here is to address the 'inflammatory language' you mentioned. I honestly do not see where I have used such language, and you can be sure I didn't mean it even if there was indeed something harsh. Re-reading, I can only see myself addressing each point that you made and even giving you advice on one. Obviously, I am not a professional to be teaching others, but I also had the same issues with managing architectures in my first package <https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=wipemychat-bin&id=af8ae5b59df2612097800e5187e532f156fa6c86>, so I thought I'd leave a link to the wiki to help you. Again, I'm sorry that I made you feel this way. I hope this email has cleared things up and we can move forward constructively. Vitalii On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:24 PM GeorgeRaven <georgeravencommun...@pm.me> wrote: > Hey, > > This user has spuriously opened a deletion request for this and a few > other multi-arch packages I manage for Kubernetes, namely: > > - kubectl-bin > - kubeadm-bin > - kubelet-bin > - cni-plugins-bin > > While they do not see the value in multi-arch packages which extend beyond > upstream support, I do not believe this precludes the packages' existence > to support more architectures. > > As I have stated to them in other messages, if they have a particular > issue with the package not working for them on other architectures they > should instead inform me to remedy the issue, rather than spurious deletion > requests, and inflammatory language. > > Thanks, > > Dr. GO > > PS: I have replied to each deletion request to ensure they are in the > chain for each request, so apologies for the repetition of the message if > you happen to read all back to back. > > On Monday, February 10th, 2025 at 8:47 PM, not...@aur.archlinux.org < > not...@aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > > > > > > > vitaliikuzhdin [1] filed a deletion request for kubectl-bin [2]: > > > > Already exists in the official repositories. > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/vitaliikuzhdin/ > > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kubectl-bin/
