Re: [PRQ#64317] Deletion Request for neovim-nonicons-git Accepted

2024-10-17 Thread Robin Candau
On 10/17/24 11:51 PM, Fabio Loli wrote: Request #64317 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for neovim-nonicons-git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/ Why this has been accepted? Not having a license is not an issue for AUR In the archwiki there was wr

Re: [PRQ#64317] Deletion Request for neovim-nonicons-git Accepted

2024-10-17 Thread Fabio Loli
Request #64317 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for neovim-nonicons-git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/ Why this has been accepted? Not having a license is not an issue for AUR In the archwiki there was written to use `unkown` if license wasn't k

[PRQ#64317] Deletion Request for neovim-nonicons-git Accepted

2024-10-17 Thread notify
Request #64317 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for neovim-nonicons-git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/

Re: [PRQ#64317] Deletion Request for neovim-nonicons-git

2024-10-13 Thread Fabio Loli
dreieck [1] filed a deletion request for neovim-nonicons-git [2]: Upstream has no license, so this package must not exist. See https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2202042#p2202042 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dreieck/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/neovim-nonicons-git/

[PRQ#64317] Deletion Request for neovim-nonicons-git

2024-10-13 Thread notify
dreieck [1] filed a deletion request for neovim-nonicons-git [2]: Upstream has no license, so this package must not exist. See https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2202042#p2202042 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dreieck/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/neovim-nonicons-git/