On 10/17/24 11:51 PM, Fabio Loli wrote:
Request #64317 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]:[Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for neovim-nonicons-git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/Why this has been accepted? Not having a license is not an issue for AUR In the archwiki there was written to use `unkown` if license wasn't know
The request was submitted by the maintainer themself, the package didn't seem to have any popularity (no vote nor comment) and the latest upstream commit is 2 years old.
While not having a licence may not be an issue for the AUR, I don't think it's a good enough reason for keeping a package around that seemingly draw no attention and for which the maintainer themself express their intention of stopping maintaining it (by submitting a deletion request). No point keeping this package just for the sake of it in my opinion.
I reckon I could have state that in the comment section when I accepted the deletion request however, sorry about that.
With that said, if you're interested in maintaining this package, feel free to re-submit it :)
-- Regards, Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
