Request #42226 has been Accepted by polyzen [1]:
[Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for wire-desktop-appimage.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/polyzen/
In your opinion, maybe. but to anyone who actually prefers appimages?
Not so much.
Just drop it. We've already acknowledged that they are not the same.
On 17/06/2023 17:37, Marcell Meszaros wrote:
I am not at all against AppImage.
But the latest wire-desktop is in Arch repo, so having
wire-de
Marcell, As you so clearly pointed out, the TUs are trusted to enforce
some quality quidelines on the AUR. You are not a TU.
You claim I have not refuted your claims, however there is little reason
to do so, as I have not seen you refute any of mine. I suggest we both
drop this as I suggested
One can also install many things on the AUR by using flatpak or a package
manager. Does not mean they should be removed.
Just stop with the seeming anti-appimage, ok?
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023, 13:51 Marcell Meszaros,
wrote:
> One can also install a standalone AppImage file by running it. It does not
So, by your own admission, it is not a duplicate of a repo package then?
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 16:20, wrote:
> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wire-desktop-appimage [2]:
>
> Duplicate of repo package, not needed:
>
> https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/wire-desktop/
>
> This is a
Hi Marcell,
That may be the case, but there are many reasons to want to use an
appimage over a natively installed application. And, given that it is
not the same package, it need not be deleted. Taking the same logic to
it's extreme, one could argue that a -git and a -bin version of a
package
• AUR submission guidelines say that uploaded packages should be useful to
users and significantly different than Arch repo packages.
• Arch Electron packaging guidelines suggest to strip out the bundled
Electron/Chromium runtime from application package.
AUR/wire-desktop-appimage does not fulf
> We've already acknowledged that they are not the same.
No, we can only acknowledge that we disagree on that point.
I believe that Trusted Users are trusted to enforce some quality guidelines on
AUR.
Otherwise AUR will just descent into more and more chaos.
Which does not benefit either users
I am not at all against AppImage.
But the latest wire-desktop is in Arch repo, so having wire-desktop-appimage in
AUR is pointless.
On 17 June 2023 18:23:08 GMT+02:00, Ashleigh Rowe wrote:
>One can also install many things on the AUR by using flatpak or a package
>manager. Does not mean they sh
One can also install a standalone AppImage file by running it. It does not need
to be packaged via an AUR PKGBUILD.
On 16 June 2023 18:55:00 GMT+02:00, Ashleigh Rowe wrote:
>Hi Marcell,
>
>That may be the case, but there are many reasons to want to use an appimage
>over a natively installed app
> So, by your own admission, it is not a duplicate of a repo package then?
Hi Asleigh,
Thank you for your reply.
The way I see it, the Arch repo version integrates better with the system and
does not include unnecessary bloat.
The AUR AppImage version carries its own Electron runtime rather
MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wire-desktop-appimage [2]:
Duplicate of repo package, not needed:
https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/wire-desktop/
This is an Electron-based application, so there is no benefit in using
this AppImage in a PKGBUILD. The repo version has the exact sa
12 matches
Mail list logo
