Marcell, As you so clearly pointed out, the TUs are trusted to enforce some quality quidelines on the AUR. You are not a TU.

You claim I have not refuted your claims, however there is little reason to do so, as I have not seen you refute any of mine. I suggest we both drop this as I suggested a few messages ago, as clogging up the mailing list with this BS is hardly productive, and I didn't think I'd need to spell it out.


On 17/06/2023 19:07, Marcell Meszaros wrote:
> We've already acknowledged that they are not the same.

No, we can only acknowledge that we disagree on that point.

I believe that Trusted Users are trusted to enforce some quality guidelines on AUR.

Otherwise AUR will just descent into more and more chaos.

Which does not benefit either users, nor maintainers or TU's themselves.

When an Electron (Javascript) application is already properly configured and hosted in Arch repo, it is detrimental to have on AUR a differently packaged copy of the same internal contents with unnecessary and potentially insecure duplicated chromium/electron runtime.

You have not refuted the validity of any of my points above.


On 17 June 2023 19:41:05 GMT+02:00, Ashleigh Rowe <administra...@hax.ie> wrote:

    In your opinion, maybe. but to anyone who actually prefers
    appimages? Not so much.
    Just drop it. We've already acknowledged that they are not the same.

    On 17/06/2023 17:37, Marcell Meszaros wrote:
    I am not at all against AppImage.

    But the latest wire-desktop is in Arch repo, so having
    wire-desktop-appimage in AUR is pointless.


    On 17 June 2023 18:23:08 GMT+02:00, Ashleigh Rowe
    <administra...@hax.ie> wrote:

        One can also install many things on the AUR by using flatpak
        or a package manager. Does not mean they should be removed.

        Just stop with the seeming anti-appimage, ok?

        On Sat, 17 Jun 2023, 13:51 Marcell Meszaros,
        <marcell.mesza...@runbox.eu> wrote:

            One can also install a standalone AppImage file by
            running it. It does not need to be packaged via an AUR
            PKGBUILD.


            On 16 June 2023 18:55:00 GMT+02:00, Ashleigh Rowe
            <administra...@hax.ie> wrote:

                Hi Marcell,

                That may be the case, but there are many reasons to
                want to use an appimage over a natively installed
                application. And, given that it is not the same
                package, it need not be deleted. Taking the same
                logic to it's extreme, one could argue that a -git
                and a -bin version of a package need not both be on
                the AUR, as for users, it is the same.
                We both know, however, that this is not the case.

                On 16/06/2023 17:31, Marcell Meszaros wrote:
                > So, by your own admission, it is not a duplicate
                of a repo package then?

                Hi Asleigh,

                Thank you for your reply.

                The way I see it, the Arch repo version integrates
                better with the system and does not include
                unnecessary bloat.

                The AUR AppImage version carries its own Electron
                runtime rather than using one available from Arch repo.

                The feature set is the same.

                So, for all intents and purposes, the AUR package is
                the same for users.

                Except the latter takes up more space, and is
                potentially more insecure

                There are frequent updates of Electron in repo.
                The AUR package won't update its built-in electron
                separately.

                On the other hand, repo's wire-desktop package will
                always use the latest repo-updated version of its
                electron runtime.

                All in all, the AUR version is an inferior duplicate.

                In my understanding, it is only useful to have
                AppImage packages of especially Electron-based
                applications on AUR if the Arch repo does not carry
                that application.

                Cheers,
                Marcell (Mars)


                On 16 June 2023 17:23:12 GMT+02:00, Ashleigh Rowe
                <administra...@hax.ie> <mailto:administra...@hax.ie>
                wrote:

                    So, by your own admission, it is not a duplicate
                    of a repo package then?

                    On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 16:20,
                    <not...@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:

                        MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for
                        wire-desktop-appimage [2]:

                        Duplicate of repo package, not needed:

                        https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/wire-desktop/

                        This is an Electron-based application, so
                        there is no benefit in using
                        this AppImage in a PKGBUILD. The repo
                        version has the exact same
                        application code.

                        And repo verison is even better because it
                        does not duplicate the
                        electron runtime, but depends on the
                        relevant repo electron package.

                        [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
                        [2]
                        https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wire-desktop-appimage/

Reply via email to