Re: [PRQ#71904] Deletion Request for ruby-rails Rejected

2025-04-24 Thread Michał
Hello, To my knowledge segaja was comaintainer, so he automatically became maintainer when previous one orphaned this package. >From last snapshot of this page: https://web.archive.org/web/20241227124151/https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-rails sob., 19 kwi 2025 o 19:50 napisał(a): > > Req

[PRQ#62633] Deletion Request for deheader

2024-09-01 Thread Michał
Hi, I noticed this failure, even opened upstream issue of this: https://gitlab.com/esr/deheader/-/issues/15 I guess that esr forgot to release new version. I will reupload this package if new release comes.

Re: [PRQ#62636] Orphan Request for ruby-tk

2024-08-23 Thread Michał
Hi. You are then probably looking at https://github.com/ruby/tk/releases where 0.4.0 shows up as latest. However there definitely is 0.5.0 release as seen on https://github.com/ruby/tk/releases/tag/v0.5.0 and https://rubygems.org/gems/tk/versions/0.5.0 pt., 23 sie 2024 o 06:10 Rein Fernhout (Levit

Re: [PRQ#60999] Deletion Request for perl-test-cleannamespaces Rejected

2024-06-17 Thread Michał
Hello, What do you mean "plenty of interest"? By comments from 2019 and before? Yes, it is functional, but it is also useless now (for AUR users). This package was only ever needed for perl-moose. https://web.archive.org/web/20150801023659/https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-test-cleannamespa

Re: [PRQ#60810] Deletion Request for ruby-autoproj Rejected

2024-06-09 Thread Michał
Yes, this is not only reason. But this package has been uploaded almost 10 years ago and never touched. There has been multiple upstream releases. Package itself has only gotten 1 vote and 0 comments in all these years. I think it is pretty clear that noone is using it. It can always be re-uploaded

Re: [PRQ#57765] Deletion Request for owncloud-app-music-git

2024-03-15 Thread Michał
It does not support PHP8, fair. But AUR has plenty old php versions packaged. Owncloud itself is not dead and definitely not superseeded by Nextcloud, but it is kinda similar situation as in Open Office vs Libre Office. czw., 14 mar 2024 o 12:43 napisał(a): > > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion reque

Re: [PRQ#49408] Deletion Request for alan

2023-12-08 Thread Michał
On top of that this package has 0 comments and 0 votes. It also has not been kept update when there were other releases before the upstream repo archivisation. pt., 8 gru 2023 o 19:17 Marcell Meszaros napisał(a): > > -1 for deletion: > > >Upstream repo archived. > > The GitHub repo got unarchived

Re: [PRQ#46623] Orphan Request for xone-dkms-git

2023-08-24 Thread Michał Kopeć
been published, however I do not see that as reason enough to change to it in the PKGBUILD for `xone-dkms{,-git}`. It may be a good idea to publish it as a separate package to the AUR, if people want to use it instead. With regards, Michał Kopeć On Thu, Aug 24 2023 at 01:40:32 PM +00:00:00