Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#27057] Deletion Request for python-wget

On 7/14/21 1:49 PM, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: > phijor [1] filed a deletion request for python-wget [2]: > > The package upstream seems to be gone. The project URL 404's and I > can't seem to find where (if at all) it moved to. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/phijor/ > [2] http

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#26956] Deletion Request for libsystemd-provides

On 7/14/21 8:21 AM, dreieck wrote: > This is especially for Artix Linux, where 'libsystemd' is no longer > provided by any package, but 'systemd-libs' is provided by a > compatibility-package 'artix-archlinux-support' in [galaxy]. > > So in Artix Linux 'libsystemd-provides' translates the > 'syste

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#26854] Deletion Request for breeze-icons-extra

On 7/3/21 8:49 PM, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: > micwoj92 [1] filed a deletion request for breeze-icons-extra [2]: > > This isn't a proper PKGBUILD. I don't know what it is. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/breeze-icons-extra/ Thi

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#26724] Deletion Request for ryu-git

On 6/27/21 10:50 AM, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: > micwoj92 [1] filed a deletion request for ryu-git [2]: > > Missing 7 dependencies > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ryu-git/ This could probably be trivially solved, if anyone was

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#26623] Deletion Request for python2-rpi.gpio

On 6/24/21 2:39 PM, Morten Linderud via aur-requests wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:34:24PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-requests > wrote:>> Well uh funny story that: >> >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#arch >> >> I know this is not listed

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#26623] Deletion Request for python2-rpi.gpio

On 6/24/21 2:23 PM, Morten Linderud via aur-requests wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:06:46PM -0400, Alex Stelmachonak via aur-requests > wrote: >> What is wrong if this package is ARM (and RPi) specific? AUR is available on >> ArchLinuxARM and used by many people (including me). I don't think

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#26062] Deletion Request for mfiler4

On 5/26/21 7:18 PM, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: > micwoj92 [1] filed a deletion request for mfiler4 [2]: > > Download 404 orphan > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mfiler4/ Hi, Accepting that the software was last updated on 2015-0

Re: [aur-requests] Request: libksysguard-git

On 3/24/21 10:04 PM, Dániel Vizy via aur-requests wrote: > Dear Devs, > > I would like to request a git version for libksysguard based on > invent.kde.org > > There is a git version available: libksysguard-git >

Re: [aur-requests] AUR git version for libksysguard

On 3/24/21 7:40 PM, Dániel Vizy via aur-requests wrote: > Dear members, > I would like to request a git version for libksysguard, source from > https://invent.kde.org/plasma/libksysguard > (https://link.getmailspring.com/link/6b719285-2509-4fd1-bb54-010f31ff4...@getmailspring.com/0?redirect=https

Re: [aur-requests] Rules evasion: repeatedly re-uploading deleted packages (Was: [PRQ#23352] Deletion Request for rtl8821ce-dkms)

On 1/28/21 5:57 PM, Doug Newgard via aur-requests wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:49:58 + > notify--- via aur-requests wrote: > >> alium [1] filed a deletion request for rtl8821ce-dkms [2]: >> >> hi, >> rtl8821ce-dkms use git source (but -git suffix missing) and it is >> practically the same

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#23238] Deletion Request for ananicy-nosystemd-git

On 1/20/21 6:31 PM, Morten Linderud via aur-requests wrote: What? Artix doesn't matter for the AUR. But if this "-nosystemd" stuff introduces drama to the AUR from the Artix community I'll just remove all of it. Nobody uses this. The main drama IMO is that this is basically a duplicate of anan

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#22879] Deletion Request for pipewire-nightly

On 1/1/21 8:05 AM, Haochen Tong wrote: I never denied that -nightly was a bad choice, but pipewire-gstreamer- git doesn't look good either. It sounds like gstreamer is specifically enabled (in contrast to the official package) for some reason. It sounds *to me* like gstreamer is specifically en

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#22879] Deletion Request for pipewire-nightly

On 12/31/20 9:05 AM, Haochen Tong wrote: On Thu, 2020-12-31 at 07:22 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote: 05:58 PM hexchain: have you considered that it's entirely not ok to have two packages, one named "pipewire-git" and one named "pipewire-nightly", which build the exact same version of the code and di

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#22879] Deletion Request for pipewire-nightly

On 12/31/20 9:05 AM, Haochen Tong wrote: On Thu, 2020-12-31 at 07:22 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote: You will NOT be permitted to use the name "pipewire-nightly" for this purpose. ... even if I manage to update this package strictly once every day? :- ) Ignoring this facetious comment. The sol

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#22879] Deletion Request for pipewire-nightly

On 12/31/20 4:56 AM, Haochen Tong wrote: On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 20:41 +, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: eschwartz [1] filed a deletion request for pipewire-nightly [2]: duplicate of pipewire-git, renamed to "nightly" even though it is not in fact based on "nightly" snapshots but "minutely"