On 6/24/21 2:23 PM, Morten Linderud via aur-requests wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:06:46PM -0400, Alex Stelmachonak via aur-requests > wrote: >> What is wrong if this package is ARM (and RPi) specific? AUR is available on >> ArchLinuxARM and used by many people (including me). I don't think "Specific >> for ARM hardware" is a valid reason to delete package. > > Account has been suspended while I figure out why they are sending a fuckton > of > requests while not checking if they should or not.
Well uhhhhh funny story that: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#arch I know this is not listed in the rules of submission page, but it is in the general packaging guidelines, and it's not like we haven't been deleting packages in the past, for precisely this. The rationale being, the *Arch* User Repository is in theory supposed to be for packages which can be run on Arch. It's the same reason we delete Manjaro-specific packages. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
