Hi Marcel,
The guidelines are important, yes, however please do bear in mind that not
all applications will work with the versions of Electron on the repos, in
those situations, as well as in the situation where people wish to have a
self-contained program, not dependent on an unknown variable, an
Hi Marcel,
As per my previous email, there are numerous reasons for an Appimage
package to exist. Additionally, it is not against the packaging guidelines
to use a non-system electron build.
Please re-read them to familiarize yourself. It'll help us all out.
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 02:07, wrote:
Marcell, as per balena's own naming scheme [a], it is Balena Etcher,
this is also true of the name of their binaries [b], the packages on
other systems [c], and the name of their distributed releases on the github.
Agreed that it should be on the latest full release.
etcher-bin is not the same
wire-desktop-appimage in AUR is pointless.
On 17 June 2023 18:23:08 GMT+02:00, Ashleigh Rowe
wrote:
One can also install many things on the AUR by using flatpak or a
package manager. Does not mean they should be removed.
Just stop with the seeming anti-appimage, ok?
On Sat, 1
2023 19:41:05 GMT+02:00, Ashleigh Rowe
wrote:
In your opinion, maybe. but to anyone who actually prefers
appimages? Not so much.
Just drop it. We've already acknowledged that they are not the same.
On 17/06/2023 17:37, Marcell Meszaros wrote:
I am not at all against AppIma
oes not
> need to be packaged via an AUR PKGBUILD.
>
>
> On 16 June 2023 18:55:00 GMT+02:00, Ashleigh Rowe
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Marcell,
>>
>> That may be the case, but there are many reasons to want to use an
>> appimage over a natively installed application.
So, by your own admission, it is not a duplicate of a repo package then?
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 16:20, wrote:
> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wire-desktop-appimage [2]:
>
> Duplicate of repo package, not needed:
>
> https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/wire-desktop/
>
> This is a
17:23:12 GMT+02:00, Ashleigh Rowe
wrote:
So, by your own admission, it is not a duplicate of a repo package
then?
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 16:20, wrote:
MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for
wire-desktop-appimage [2]:
Duplicate of repo package, not need
Fabio, etcher-bin installs the binary to the system directly, this package
installs an appimage, for those that want a self-contained install. That
should count to be considered a different install, no?
Scarlett.
On Sat, 4 Mar 2023 at 14:03, wrote:
> FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for
Content host is exempt from DMCA in this situation, and is not "pirated",
but is an archive.org backup. There is no difference between using this AUR
Package and downloading the file directly from the Archive.org sit, neither
of which is illegal, and neither of which is violation of copyrights.
O
This is an erroneous deletion, as the mcreator-bin package did not use
binaries built by a third party.
The binaries used were taken directly from the mcreator github repository
releases.
These are first party builds.
On Sat, 5 Nov 2022 at 16:58, wrote:
> Request #38092 has been Accepted by bl
11 matches
Mail list logo
