jjm [1] filed a deletion request for cni-plugin-dnsname [2]:
Upstream at https://github.com/containers/dnsname was archived on
2023-11-27.
Thanks!
Joost Molenaar
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jjm/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/cni-plugin-dnsname/
michael.gruz [1] filed a deletion request for cura-5-modern-beta-bin
[2]:
old not function package
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/michael.gruz/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/cura-5-modern-beta-bin/
Request #49424 has been Rejected by MarsSeed [1]:
Maintainer has fixed the package.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
Request #49180 has been Rejected by MarsSeed [1]:
Deferring due to low priority, and to ease the burden on PM's.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
Btw submitting this request was not just a "Marcell" whim, there's ample
precedent.
See @Muflone's deletion request against a user-submitted firefox-xdg:
[PRQ#48496] (7 Oct '23)
https://lists.archlinux.org/hyperkitty/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/thread/6L2R7CBSOUBVKDCLGBWHISIEUHSL2KSO
On 27 February 2024 04:48:15 GMT+01:00, a...@serebit.com wrote:
>I would ask that the maintainer open a request to merge the packages, then,
>given the comment history that I read shows you being belligerent about
>conky-lua-nv being unncessary as the maintainer rightfully defends a package
>tha
>> Exception to this strict rule may only be packages having extra features
>> enabled and/or patches in comparison to the official ones. In such an
>> occasion the pkgname should be different to express that difference.
>
>Check and check. If you're going to cite the rules, make sure you've read
The arguments made by the maintainer appear to hold up, and until
>https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/conky/-/issues/1
>is resolved, this package does have *some* reason to exist. Closing.
Which arguments exactly? Repo package has all the features that this has.
Only AUR/co
On 27 February 2024 03:48:20 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
>Request #48780 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
>
>Personal disagreement with a particular patch is not an acceptable
>reason to file a deletion request.
There was nothing personal in my submission reason.
What about AUR's
Request #48838 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Abandonware.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48817 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source inaccessible.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48865 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Package is broken, upstream was archived in 2022.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54202 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
No longer maintained.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #49014 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Broken PKGBUILD, last updated in mid 2010s, orphaned.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #49013 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Broken PKGBUILD, last updated in mid 2010s, orphaned.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #49012 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Broken PKGBUILD, last updated in mid 2010s, orphaned.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48871 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Fails to install, no updates since 2018.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #49534 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
kratos-bin no longer exists.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Back to the topic of this package, I am observing a bit of a mixed / confused
standard.
Many times you said if a package is not broken, it can stay. Then when my
additional message stated that this is indeed broken, you said I didn't say
how it is broken. But I did say what are the reasons beh
Request #49262 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
-bin package already exists for m3u8-downloader.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #49392 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
No updates since 2017, sources 404.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48919 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
No maintainer, original submitter deleted their account, no update
since 2015.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48874 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Merge seems acceptable.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48883 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Broken build, uses sudo, unmaintained.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54198 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Current build fails. No updates since 2016.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54147 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Maintainer says no longer needed.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54236 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Maintainer says no longer needed.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48870 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Sources and URL appear to be unavailable.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48921 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Broken and abandoned PKGBUILD.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48935 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Not an actual VCS package, abandoned.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54158 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source no longer accessible.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54159 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
This PKGBUILD is just fascinating. Its only source is the Boost
license.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #4 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Just a strange package in general...
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48952 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Who still uses Automake anyway? Definitely not this version, that's
for sure.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48951 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Who still uses Automake anyway? Definitely not this version, that's
for sure.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48771 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Abandoned, flagged out of date, no votes. Fine to delete.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48833 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source no longer accessible, last updated 9 years ago.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #49076 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
The maintainer themselves thinks we should bury this package, so I'll
oblige.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #49027 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Broken package, deprecated by upstream.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #49074 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Superseded by bin32-firefox.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48780 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
Personal disagreement with a particular patch is not an acceptable
reason to file a deletion request.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48746 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
The arguments made by the maintainer appear to hold up, and until
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/conky/-/issues/1
is resolved, this package does have *some* reason to exist. Closing.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/
Request #54169 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source no longer available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54170 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source no longer available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54171 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source no longer available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54199 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source no longer available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54208 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source no longer available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54200 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source no longer available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54209 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source no longer available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54210 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source no longer available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54211 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source no longer available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54212 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source no longer available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54201 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Source is no longer available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48922 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Sources return 404.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48984 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
BitBucket no longer supports Mercurial repositories, so this package
cannot be recovered under this name.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54174 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Requester is the maintainer of both packages. Reasonable request.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #53770 has been Rejected by MarsSeed [1]:
Package has been updated and fixed - thank you, @IslandC0der!
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
On 27 February 2024 02:12:57 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
>Request #52583 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
>
>This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
>the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
>electron build that the maintainer
xiota [1] filed a deletion request for icecat-browser [2]:
No longer needed.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xiota/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/icecat-browser/
Request #52579 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52580 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52581 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52583 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52584 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52585 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52578 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52577 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52576 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52575 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52574 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52573 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-libdbusmenu-qt [2]:
No longer needed by anything, and lib32-qt4 has been failing to build
for the last 9 months.
Anyway this was just an optional addon, to allow exporting a Qt4
application's menu item list to the desktop environment, letting it
pla
Request #52572 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52571 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52570 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52569 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52568 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package is a customized
electron build that the maintainer uses for his personal projects,
which use Electron as a web browser to naviga
Request #52589 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package uses Electron as a
web browser to navigate a streaming media website. Electron is *not* a
web browser. Although it uses the same
Request #52588 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package uses Electron as a
web browser to navigate a streaming media website. Electron is *not* a
web browser. Although it uses the same
Request #52587 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package uses Electron as a
web browser to navigate a streaming media website. Electron is *not* a
web browser. Although it uses the same
Request #52586 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package uses Electron as a
web browser to navigate a streaming media website. Electron is *not* a
web browser. Although it uses the same
Request #52582 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
This package should be deleted because it compromises the security of
the systems on which it is installed. This package uses Electron as a
web browser to navigate a streaming media website. Electron is *not* a
web browser. Although it uses the same
Request #48891 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
a joke deletion that does something
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48773 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Broken PKGBUILD with questionable value.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48751 has been Accepted by muflone [1]:
[Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for waybar-hyprland-cava-git.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/
Request #48774 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Superseded by gmrun in extra
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48872 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Upstream is dead.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #54191 has been Rejected by MarsSeed [1]:
Closing this request, as maintainer has responded and also initiated a
package rename+merge: PRQ#54204.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
@aksr is also extremely hostile, it is not much fruitful for me to communicate
with him. I would just receive more personal attacks and slurs from him, even
in places where I can't respond (see [a])
This is a severe thing I didn't wanted to read at this time (1.50 AM).
I've just suspended @ak
Request #48766 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Upstream repo no longer available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
Request #48767 has been Accepted by serebit [1]:
Upstream repo no longer available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
1) you request hasn't reported the package was broken
>2) also your reply doesn't report what's broken
>
>that's what I told you, until it's not broken there's no reason to delete it.
>not providing the mailx binary is not a reason to delete it
Muflone, my followup message did report what's broke
Request #48726 has been Accepted by muflone [1]:
[Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for phoenixfs-git.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/
Request #48722 has been Accepted by muflone [1]:
[Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for krita-plus-git.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/
Request #48721 has been Accepted by muflone [1]:
[Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for krita-plus-bin.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/
> python-pyside has gone to the heaven
XDDD
Thank you :)
I appreciate your humor, and also your attention to detail, and your reasonable
high standards when it comes to package decisions!
Sorry for being perhaps sloppy sometimes, I really try to take care I will do
better and better next tim
Request #48720 has been Accepted by muflone [1]:
[Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for krita-next-git.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/
Request #48714 has been Accepted by muflone [1]:
[Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for check_pidfile.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/
Request #50428 has been Accepted by muflone [1]:
[Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for check_pidfile.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/
Request #48707 has been Accepted by muflone [1]:
[Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for luna-manager.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
