Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#24378] Merge Request for python-kb

2021-03-25 Thread Christopher Snowhill (kode54) via aur-requests
I did not say you had to, but it helps if anyone is actually using the package, to notice on update that it changed name. Safe to ignore I guess if nobody has voted for the package. > On Mar 25, 2021, at 9:40 PM, notify--- via aur-requests > wrote: > > gnebbia [1] filed a request to merge py

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24379] Merge Request for python-kb-git

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
gnebbia [1] filed a request to merge python-kb-git [2] into kb-git [3]: I requested the deletion of this repository, but somebody told me to request the merge. So please merge this with the above indicated package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/gnebbia/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgba

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24378] Merge Request for python-kb

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
gnebbia [1] filed a request to merge python-kb [2] into kb [3]: I requested the deletion, but somebody told I have to request the merge! So I request the merge for this package! I only want "kb" to be available. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/gnebbia/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#24375] Deletion Request for python-kb

2021-03-25 Thread Christopher Snowhill (kode54) via aur-requests
It's one of the request types you may file from the AUR web site. Orphan, Merge, or Delete. Merge also asks for the name of the candidate to merge into. > On Mar 25, 2021, at 8:32 PM, Giuseppe Nebbione > wrote: > >  > I am sorry Sir, but I am not confident with the AUR, and am not able in the

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24377] Deletion Request for neovim-coc-python-git

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
sainnhe [1] filed a deletion request for neovim-coc-python-git [2]: This package is not being maintained anymore. From their README: ``` WARNING: it's recommended to use coc-pyright if you're using python3 or use coc-jedi if you're using jedi, the code of coc-python is too hard to maintain! ```

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#24375] Deletion Request for python-kb

2021-03-25 Thread Christopher Snowhill via aur-requests
As I said, it should be a merge request, so that requests to the old package get redirected. > On Thursday, Mar 25, 2021 at 7:54 PM, Giuseppe Nebbione > mailto:nebbionegiuse...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > The package has been pushed under the name "kb" now, tested and works nicely. > So we can delet

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24376] Deletion Request for python-kb-git

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
gnebbia [1] filed a deletion request for python-kb-git [2]: I request the deletion of this package for two reasons: 1) Out of date 2) The name has changed to "kb-git" to be consistent with the other package "kb". The package is not named "python-kb" since this is not a python module but more a bin

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#24375] Deletion Request for python-kb

2021-03-25 Thread Christopher Snowhill via aur-requests
> On Thursday, Mar 25, 2021 at 7:47 PM, notify--- via aur-requests > mailto:aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org)> > wrote: > gnebbia [1] filed a deletion request for python-kb [2]: > > I request the deletion of this package for two reasons: > 1) the package is out-of-date > 2) More importantly this

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24375] Deletion Request for python-kb Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24375 has been accepted by ainola [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24375] Deletion Request for python-kb

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
gnebbia [1] filed a deletion request for python-kb [2]: I request the deletion of this package for two reasons: 1) the package is out-of-date 2) More importantly this has changed name to "kb" since it is not a python module, but more a program [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/gnebbia/ [2] ht

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24274] Merge Request for ttf-material-design-icons Rejected

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24274 has been rejected by ainola [1]: This is Google's official name, so it makes sense to keep it in line with what their project is titled. The upstream of that community-led project should consider a better name. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24335] Merge Request for mindmaster Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24335 has been accepted by ainola [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24178] Deletion Request for dotnet-core-3.1 Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24178 has been accepted by ainola [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24152] Deletion Request for kodi-addon-pulsar Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24152 has been accepted by ainola [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24353] Deletion Request for vim-coc-python-git Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24353 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User Repository package request system: The user ainola deleted the package.

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24354] Deletion Request for vim-coc-python-git Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24354 has been accepted by ainola [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24368] Deletion Request for vim-coc-master-git Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24368 has been accepted by ainola [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24369] Deletion Request for neovim-coc-master-git Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24369 has been accepted by ainola [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24364] Deletion Request for rocm-smi Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24364 has been accepted by ainola [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24339] Merge Request for qt5-olm-git Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24339 has been accepted by ainola [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24341] Deletion Request for signon-ui-webengine Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24341 has been accepted by ainola [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24127] Deletion Request for jellyfin-server-bin Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24127 has been accepted by ainola [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24126] Deletion Request for jellyfin-web-bin Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24126 has been accepted by ainola [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24056] Orphan Request for pulseaudio-module-xrdp-git Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24056 has been accepted by ainola [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24359] Deletion Request for multimc5-offline Rejected

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24359 has been rejected by ainola [1]: AUR packages are buildscripts and not pre-built packages; therefore, we are not bound to any EULAs or third-party licenses. If there is a legal issue with the upstream software, that should be managed on the hoster's level (in this case, GitHub). [1

Re: [aur-requests] AUR git version for libksysguard

2021-03-25 Thread Piotr Górski via aur-requests
I have no idea why you are so strenuously hammering and asking for a new PKGBUILD when all you have to do is change the branch from master to Plasma/5.21? Why duplicate it? czw., 25 mar 2021 o 16:23 Stefan Husmann a.k.a. haawda via aur-requests < aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org> napisał(a): > >

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24035] Orphan Request for woof Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24035 has been accepted by polyzen [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/polyzen/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24373] Deletion Request for maximal Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24373 has been accepted by polyzen [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/polyzen/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24374] Orphan Request for netatalk

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
victor3d [1] filed an orphan request for netatalk [2]: The package need to be patched. Is won't compile without the patch [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/victor3d/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/netatalk/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24373] Deletion Request for maximal

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
crazygolem [1] filed a deletion request for maximal [2]: Abandoned by maintainer, broken for a long time. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/crazygolem/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/maximal/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24372] Orphan Request for arrayfire-git

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
titaniumtown [1] filed an orphan request for arrayfire-git [2]: Package has been abandoned for a while now, this should be orphaned so someone else can start maintaining it again. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/titaniumtown/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/arrayfire-git/

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24372] Orphan Request for arrayfire-git Accepted

2021-03-25 Thread notify--- via aur-requests
Request #24372 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User Repository package request system: The package base has been flagged out-of-date since 2017-07-09.

Re: [aur-requests] AUR git version for libksysguard

2021-03-25 Thread Stefan Husmann a.k.a. haawda via aur-requests
Dániel Vizy via aur-requests writes: > Dear members, > > I would like to request a git version for libksysguard, source from > https://invent.kde.org/plasma/libksysguard . > > There is a git version available, but the source: > https://kde.org/plasma-desktop/ and

Re: [aur-requests] Request: libksysguard-git

2021-03-25 Thread Dániel Vizy via aur-requests
I installed the libksysguard-git AUR. I can confirm that it's includes all the bug fixes I was looking for. I was a little-bit confused, caused by the version number and the last updated date of the AUR (2021-02-01 23:36) is different from the last commit's date on github. Thank you for your kind a