Re: [aur-general] AUR ssh:// click-to-copy URLs don't work

On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 07:12:24PM +0100, Manuel Reimer via aur-general wrote: > On 07.03.22 20:59, mpan via aur-general wrote: > > > I believe this is a genuine bug and a report should be opened at > > > . > >   As a correction for whoever would com

Re: [aur-general] AUR v6.0.8 Status Update

In regards to the aforementioned issue, we believe this is due to local Redis instance going away for a short time. This is not a common occurrence, and so this should not affect users most of the time. That being said, we will be accounting for this in our code to rid users of receiving the error

Re: [aur-general] AUR Account was Suspended

Extra: Please check the SSH public key you're using exists for your account on /account//edit after logging in. -- Kevin Morris Software & Linux Enthusiast signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] AUR Account was Suspended

Hi hr567, If you could, could you please tell us: - which username / email you're speaking about on aur.archlinux.org - the exact details surrounding the problem > I was trying to submit a package (apifox) to AUR some time ago when I found > that my AUR account was suspended We need some more sp

[aur-general] RPC POST & Archive Checksums

Hi AURers, The v6.0.9 tag has brought in some new features regarding the AUR and archive checksums: - archive checksums are now available to be used to verify integrity at https://aur.archlinux.org/.gz.sha256 - RPC now supports POST requests Archive checksum verification: $ curl -sO https:

Re: [aur-general] yaourt - Was: aurweb v6.0.0 Release

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 05:42:27PM +0100, sL1pKn07 SpinFlo via aur-general wrote: > in some cases still working for me. > > for example yesterday when upgrade a lib32 package stored in [AUR] (the > "64bits" counterpart package landed in [testing]), which yay refuse to > reload the dependencies wh

[aur-general] AUR v6.0.8 Status Update

Hi AURers, I've got a bit of a status update for all of you users regarding the state of the newly released >= v6.0.0 aurweb. It took a matter of days to get several quirks worked out, which were a result of a few reasons: - AUR historical database state not seen on local systems which the port w

Re: [aur-general] v6.0.0 AUR RPC Changes

Aforementioned patches have been deployed to https://aur.archlinux.org. Happy querying! -- Kevin Morris Software & Linux Enthusiast signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] v6.0.0 AUR RPC Changes

Hello RPC users, There are a few problematic changes that have occurred with the aurweb v6.0.0 release regarding the RPC that I'd like to address here. With the v6.0.0 release, aurweb no longer uses PHP. Previously, the Wiki has shown `/rpc.php` being used to query the RPC, which did work and was

[aur-general] aurweb v6.0.0 Release

Hello AUR users, First of all, I want to apologize: this was deployed about 6 hours ago without a prior announcement. This was completely my fault and done in a bit of haste. There are a few bugs seen so far which have been worked out and deployed, but there are some final patches waiting to be de

Re: [aur-general] laptop broke, co-maintainers needed.

Hi zoorat, I hope your machine rests in peace and you find a way to get a new one. Sounds like a huge bummer. I'm down to comaintain a few packages; some particular ones I'm interested in: - alacritty-themes - python-torrequest Stay up! (aka. keep your head up, remain positive) Regards, Kevin

Re: [aur-general] Why were my 'makedeb-beta' and 'makedeb-alpha' packages deleted?

; packages to be reliably available to end users. > > > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/google-chrome-beta/ > > [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/google-chrome-dev/ > > [3]: https://github.com/makedeb/makedeb/branches > > > > --- > > Hunter

Re: [aur-general] Why were my 'makedeb-beta' and 'makedeb-alpha' packages deleted?

I can't speak for grawlinson, but I did want to bring up a point that, off the top of my head, might be a reason for deletion requests. In software, `alpha` is used for a release before a `beta` or a straight up release. `beta` is used in the same way, but is more tightly coupled directly behind a

Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch Linux

Hi Simon, Personally, I can't say that I'm too interested in most of these packages, but I just wanted to mention: If you have no comaintainers for a package, you could simply wait until another user flags the package out of date and AUR goes through the standard process of orphan requests. This

Re: [aur-general] New AUR Metadata Archives

Nov 12, 2021 at 12:16:21AM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Kevin Morris via aur-general (aur-general@lists.archlinux.org) wrote: > > > The files are downloadable in gzip format; when you receive > > the file, you'll need to uncompress it. > > There might in fact be

Re: [aur-general] New AUR Metadata Archives

Hi zoorat, The files are downloadable in gzip format; when you receive the file, you'll need to uncompress it. Example: $ curl --output packages-meta-ext-v1.json.gz \ 'https://aur.archlinux.org/packages-meta-ext-v1.json.gz' # zcat is cat for gz files; it uncompresses and cats th

Re: [aur-general] New AUR Metadata Archives

Hi Dmitry, The ordering is definitely a bug here that we should fix up and will. Otherwise, we'd just like to make sure that the info format is uniform with the RPC; beyond that, we can without a doubt add other fields if they're needed for good reason. Do you mind reporting that in the form of a

Re: [aur-general] New AUR Metadata Archives

amiec via aur-general wrote: > > > On 10/11/2021 22:31, Kevin Morris via aur-general wrote: > > Hello AUR users, > > > > In addition to pre-existing archives, we've introduced two new > > archives that can be used instead of bulk queries agai

Re: [aur-general] New AUR Metadata Archives

e this. On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 12:15:28AM +, Morgan Adamiec via aur-general wrote: > > > On 10/11/2021 22:31, Kevin Morris via aur-general wrote: > > Hello AUR users, > > > > In addition to pre-existing archives, we've introduced two new > > archives tha

[aur-general] New AUR Metadata Archives

Hello AUR users, In addition to pre-existing archives, we've introduced two new archives that can be used instead of bulk queries against the RPC. Pre-existing archives: - packages.gz - Listing of all packages separated by line break. - pkgbase.gz - Listing of all package bases separated

Re: [aur-general] Handling own requests (Was: [PRQ#29045] Deletion Request for hugo-bin)

That is kind of what I was thinking; we are improving the accountability regardless, so there really would be no possible way for ninja deletions to occur. I'll keep looking on this thread for more feedback, though, in case anyone brings up a nice point/idea. Thanks guys. On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at

Re: [aur-general] Handling own requests (Was: [PRQ#29045] Deletion Request for hugo-bin)

I'd be up for programmatically making it impossible for any user (user or TU) to accept their own requests. However, that does bring some complications into play in regards to deleting packages. Currently, on the /packages search page (for a TU), it is possible to delete packages without a reques

[aur-general] FastAPI aurweb Testing Announcement

Hello AUR users, It is my pleasure to finally announce the initial "beta" testing stage of the FastAPI aurweb implementation. This development has majorly happened in the background, so it may come as a surprise to some. For those who want a quick check, we've deployed aurweb's development branch

[aur-general] RPC v1-v4 Deprecated Support Ended

Hello AUR Users, The RPC version 1-4 deprecation period has now ended. At this time, users should rely on the fact that support for version 1-4 may be dropped at any time. If you own a project which uses the RPC API, you'll want to comply with the version 5 API immediately. See the Deprecation No

[aur-general] RPC v1-v4 Deprecation Notice

Hello AUR users, With the advent of FastAPI aurweb development, we've done some reviewing of the RPC API. With each increasing version to the RPC, it has become quite a heavy component of aurweb to maintain in complete back-compatibility mode for legacy RPC version users. These legacy versions re

Re: [aur-general] Want A Comaintainer For Your Project?

Hi Michael, (Duplicate; did not reply to all the first time..., sorry Michael) Thank you! I am definitely interested, but I need a couple of days before I can reliably test GUI apps on Arch Linux. I shall reply to your thread when I'm ready to go, and I'm happy to help with those. Won't be long.

[aur-general] Want A Comaintainer For Your Project?

Hello AUR users, My name is Kevin Morris, also known as kevr. I've been getting interested in possibly helping out more with packages in general. I do not own too many in the AUR myself. Most of them are scripts that I developed and wanted to share with the community. My AUR Packages: - python-

Re: [aur-general] Procedure for reviving a deleted AUR package

Hi Yash, Glad you got it solved. I'd like to share some information on this issue for the future, however: If a package has been deleted, it should still be contained in the AUR git repository. In this case, one can clone the repository in question, make a bump revision to the PKGBUILD and push i

Re: [aur-general] Package Request and/or TU Application

I do like Giancarlo's idea because it would really future proof a lot of Python libraries we use; we could just lock versions in requirements.txt. It just feels a bit odd that we're splitting between two different package managers, especially because we still have to depend on several arch packages

[aur-general] Package Request and/or TU Application

Hi aur-general, I've come across a Python library which serves a nice purpose for aurweb's FastAPI implementation, but noticed that it is not yet maintained in the Arch official repositories. For aurweb, we'd like to stick to packages which exist within our official repositories, and so I'm here t

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD review request (REXPaint)

Hi Vince, I understand that you'd like to get REXpaint in the AUR. Rather than communicating over a long mailing list thread, do you mind joining us in #archlinux-aurweb at some point on Libera? Could help out a lot more directly and take a look at things without producing additions to this thread

Re: [aur-general] Request for Public Review of REXPaint package

to be possibly automated in some ways, that's probably a better idea than using $HOME/.config for something like this. Regards, Kevin On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 02:20:48PM -0700, Kevin Morris via aur-general wrote: > That is absolutely insecure. Upstream should probably provide a > way to provid

Re: [aur-general] Request for Public Review of REXPaint package

That is absolutely insecure. Upstream should probably provide a way to provide overrides to those files, which probably means also dealing with prioritizing an override location over /usr/share defaults. Some packages have used /opt to do things like this in the past. Personally, I try to avoid us

Re: [aur-general] Pushing rc version of package to aur

. Sounds like the upstream maintainer just needs to push out the release. There's got to be some reason they have not. Regards, Kevin On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 02:28:45PM +0200, Jan Kohnert via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > Am Freitag, 30. Juli 2021, 22:54:04 CEST schrieb Kevin Morris v

Re: [aur-general] Pushing rc version of package to aur

If 1.0.0-rc.3 is why they're flagging it out of date, perhaps you could reply to them and explain why it's not out of date; an rc is a release candidate, but not necessarily a true release. After rc makes its way to a true release, that's when upstream is telling everybody that there's a new releas

Re: [aur-general] SSH Key Denied Problem

Glad you guys got it solved! On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 09:29:28PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 7/8/21 9:09 PM, Matt Spaulding via aur-general wrote: > > Well, as soon as I sent this I think I figured it out. There is an error > > message when updating the SSH key, but I don't see

Re: [aur-general] SSH Key Denied Problem

Hi Matt, Thank you for maintaining some AUR packages and helping the world out! On to the point: We do not believe this is an issue on the server side, as we can all seem to contact AUR with our account keys properly. But, we would like to solve this issue if possible. For some more personal and

[aur-general] Mailing List Address Update

Hi aur-general, The mailing list has undergone a specific modification in which @archlinux.org no longer deals with or redirects to @lists.archlinux.org. At this point, the newly required address for the aur-general mailing list is: aur-general@lists.archlinux.org Thank you all for the hard wor