Hi Dmitry, The ordering is definitely a bug here that we should fix up and will. Otherwise, we'd just like to make sure that the info format is uniform with the RPC; beyond that, we can without a doubt add other fields if they're needed for good reason.
Do you mind reporting that in the form of an [Bug] issue on gitlab? That helps us a lot with keeping track of these things. Thanks a lot for your feedback and your quick action! Regards, Kevin On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 05:04:50PM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov via aur-general wrote: > Hi! > > > In addition to pre-existing archives, we've introduced two new > > archives that can be used instead of bulk queries against the RPC. > > Thanks a lot for doing this, I'm switching Repology right onto the new > dump. This simplifies and speeds up repository metadata update in many > ways and also provides consistent information from one point in time. > > I've verified that the contents I've been getting through the API > (/rpc/?v=5&type=info for all packages from packages.gz) are the same > except from minor differerences in License ordering (can you confirm > that it's stable?) and the fact that unicode characters in descriptions > are now correctly represented (abra package as example). Just FYI. > > I wonder how hard it will be to also provide download URLs in this dump. > For instance, Repology uses these to report dead URLs. > > -- > Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D > amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: https://github.com/AMDmi3 https://amdmi3.ru > -- Kevin Morris Software Developer Identities: - kevr @ Libera
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
