That means the package has probably been deleted either by the maintainer or an
admin, so it's ok to overwrite.
Yash Karandikar
d5c4 1cbc 071b 41b3 f235 da13 f01e 92cd 2390 f369
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 21/10/07 04:26, Strahinya Radich via aur-general wrote:
> I thought I saw the package for a Go program "poe" appearing in some package
> search, but repeating the search now I can't find it. I found at least three
> packages with the same name, without an AUR package. Two are in Go:
It appears
On 21/10/07 03:11, Greg Minshall via aur-general wrote:
> that makes sense to me, too. but, am i right that it would also be
> legitimate, and even typical, for the package author to add a "poe"
> package to AUR? i.e, my sense is that quite often both "foo" and
> "foo-git" packages co-exist in AU
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:11:43PM +0300, Greg Minshall via aur-general wrote:
> Jonathon Fernyhough via aur-general wrote:
>
> > You might want to give them a little more time.
>
> that makes sense to me, too. but, am i right that it would also be
> legitimate, and even typical, for the package
Jonathon Fernyhough via aur-general wrote:
> You might want to give them a little more time.
that makes sense to me, too. but, am i right that it would also be
legitimate, and even typical, for the package author to add a "poe"
package to AUR? i.e, my sense is that quite often both "foo" and
"
