On 21/10/07 03:11, Greg Minshall via aur-general wrote: > that makes sense to me, too. but, am i right that it would also be > legitimate, and even typical, for the package author to add a "poe" > package to AUR? i.e, my sense is that quite often both "foo" and > "foo-git" packages co-exist in AUR. (whether they are normally > maintained by the same, or by different, people, i don't know.)
I thought I saw the package for a Go program "poe" appearing in some package search, but repeating the search now I can't find it. I found at least three packages with the same name, without an AUR package. Two are in Go: https://github.com/prodhe/poe https://github.com/godwhoa/poe and one appears to be in a mixture of languages: https://git.rhe.jp/poe.git/tree/README.md In any case, I also think that creating and maintaining the "poe" package would perhaps be the best option, as I still haven't received a reply from fossdd, so I will do that. Thank you all again.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
