On 6/14/24 07:39, Chime Hart wrote:
Well David-and-All, even though I switched back to Debian, I am running 6.9.4
from Zabbly. So I rebooted, have not noticed any changes. Out of the box I am
getting 67by240, but I run an Lat15 to double an amount of lines to 135. I am
also totally blind, so ju
On 6/14/24 03:54, Dave Howorth wrote:
[snip]
[ 1035.285] (II) intel(0): switch to mode1920x1080@60.0 on VGA1
using pipe 0, position (0, 0), rotation normal, reflection none
[ 1035.296] (II) intel(0): Setting screen physical size to 508 x 285
After update to 6.9.4 that becomes:
[snip]
If dkms has anything to do with monitors, last kernel that supported dkms
was 6.80 so dkms likely isn't working now. Good excuse to remove those
packages and find other ways to accommodate hardware. I found this out
after installing kernel 6.94 a couple days ago.
--
Jude
"There are four boxe
I too have no issues with 6.9.4 (including laptops, monitors and an
older TV) so its quite possible the issue David has is hardware
specific.
1) Perhaps its useful to compare what edid your monitors provide using
6.9.3 and 6.9.4 kernels.
To do so, one way is to build the edid-decode-git package
Well David-and-All, even though I switched back to Debian, I am running 6.9.4
from Zabbly. So I rebooted, have not noticed any changes. Out of the box I am
getting 67by240, but I run an Lat15 to double an amount of lines to 135. I am
also totally blind, so just going by a text console.
Chime
Hi,
There is no question, there is something that changed in the 6.9.4 kernel
update that changed monitor/resolution detection and which is selected on
boot. Let me know what logs and I'll get them to you. Happy to e-mail logs off
list as well if that will help.
Maybe you can bisect with http
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:12:36 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> On 6/13/24 05:00, Christian Heusel wrote:
> > Then please also share the full logs ;)
>
>Looking at the Xorg.0.log for both 6.9.3 and 6.9.4 kernels, it is
> clear the 6.9.3 log selects the correct 1920x1080 resolution while
> th
