On 6/14/24 03:54, Dave Howorth wrote:
[snip]
[  1035.285] (II) intel(0): switch to mode1920x1080@60.0  on VGA1
using pipe 0, position (0, 0), rotation normal, reflection none
[  1035.296] (II) intel(0): Setting screen physical size to 508 x 285

    After update to 6.9.4 that becomes:

[snip]
[  5371.571] (II) intel(0): switch to mode1024x768@75.0  on VGA1
using pipe 0, position (0, 0), rotation normal, reflection none
[  5371.576] (II) intel(0): Setting screen physical size to 270 x 203
[snip]
/^.............//' 6.9.4-Xorg.0.log)

    No remarkable difference other than the resolutions chosen.
The physical screen size (and implied aspect ratio) is also very
different. Is either correct?


Yes, the 6.9.3 kernel gets it right. Every other kernel since arch was installed on 1/8/17 has gotten it right. Something in 6.9.4 seems to have changed. Likely an unintended side effect of some other change.

Bug opened:

  https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/linux/-/issues/62


--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

Reply via email to