On March 2, 2018 12:38:33 PM GMT+01:00, Dan Haworth wrote:
>On 02/03/18 11:17, Alajos Odoyle wrote:
>> On 2018-03-02 11:38, Dan Haworth wrote:
>>>
>>> I had the same issue, seems to be related to the following bug
>>> https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/6752. I downgraded ncurses to
>6.0
>>> to
On April 7, 2018 6:18:39 AM GMT+02:00, "David C. Rankin"
wrote:
>On 04/01/2018 07:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>
>>
>> I was looking for confirmation of the bug and whether the devs want
>it
>> filed here to track or to not waste time filing with Arch and just
>file
>> upstream?
>>
>
>I susp
On 07/23/2018 10:43 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> [1]
> 4.17.8 still in Core allegedly also contains it.
>
> $ grep pkg.e.= linux/repos/core-x86_64/PKGBUILD
> pkgver=4.17.8
> pkgrel=1
> $ grep SALSA linux/repos/core-x86_64/config
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_SALSA20=m
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_SALSA20_X86_64=m
>
> I unins
On July 30, 2018 5:14:56 PM GMT+02:00, "данила кивер via arch-general"
wrote:
>
>I want one of his packages (
>https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/visualvm ) to be
>updated because an important bug was fixed in the upstream (I've
>already built this package, installed and tested loc
On 9/9/18 10:26 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> On 9/9/18, Gus wrote:
>> Linux-hardened doesn't support hibernation and i think it's overkill to
>> use it on desktop.
>
> Not arguing in anyway for or against AppArmor, just another
> data point regarding linux-hardened 4.17 and 4.18:
On 9/10/18 1:43 PM, Carsten Mattner wrote:
> On 9/10/18, Levente Polyak via arch-general
> wrote:
>> Just a crazy idea but how about contributing back instead of just
>> complaining? People on the bug tracker always help guiding how to report
>> upstream or finding releva
On 9/10/18 5:58 PM, Geo Kozey wrote:
> I think you may consider disabling CONFIG_PANIC_ON_OOPS in linux-hardened
> default config. Preventing users from being able to debug and report their
> issues upstream or even discouraging them from using linux-hardend at all is
> quite a big cost of it. Aski
On 9/10/18 7:31 PM, Geo Kozey wrote:
>>
>> From: Levente Polyak
>> Sent: Mon Sep 10 18:42:14 CEST 2018
>> To: Geo Kozey
>> Cc: General Discussion about Arch Linux
>> Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support
>>
>> I think you are totally missing the po
On 9/17/18 6:27 PM, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote:
>
> Going forward with the new release policies, would it be better to just have
> an
> openjdk/openjre package that's always the latest version, then versioned
> packages for the lts releases, such as they are?
>
This is exactly what wil
On February 14, 2019 12:17:02 AM GMT+01:00, "brent s."
wrote:
>On 2/13/19 5:18 PM, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:25:19 -0500
>> "brent s." wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/13/19 3:16 PM, Storm Dragon via arch-general wrote:
Hi,
I'm having some issues with insta
As already stated, may you just wait until it's rules out, problems with other
packages fixed, rebuild and replaced? Thanks
On April 4, 2019 7:11:07 PM GMT+02:00, Maarten de Vries via arch-general
wrote:
>A better fix is mentioned on the steam forum [1] by a WorMzy:
>> $ export
>LD_PRELOAD="/usr/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0:/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0"
>> $ steam-native
>
>Apparently those libraries still come from the steam dis
On June 16, 2019 5:57:34 PM GMT+02:00, Eli Schwartz via arch-general
wrote:
>That being said, if you have signed the repository db then as you
>mentioned the sha256 checksums for the package file are securely
>signed,
>so you are guaranteed that use of pacman -S pkgname will securely
>verify
>tha
On 6/21/19 8:25 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> After 5.12.1 is there any further mitigation needed for:
>
>
> https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-11477
>
> related:
>
> https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-11478
> https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?na
On 10/1/19 12:58 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming via arch-general wrote:
> Noted with thanks.
>
> [...]
@Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
@José Vilmar Estácio de Souza
Please do not top-post. On all Arch mailing lists we have a bottom-post
policy for replies (it also makes reading posts more
On 2/2/20 10:59 PM, Christopher W. via arch-general wrote:
> Hi. The wiki states that database signatures for pacman are currently
> a work in progress. It's been that way for a long time, so I assume
> there is no "progress" happening. What is currently in the way of this
> much-needed security fe
On 2/12/20 12:58 AM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
> I've selected a few to highlight based on age and my own view of
> importance (no claim its a good view).
>
> So, here's a few that might benefit from an update:
>Cal Pkg
> NameVe
On 6/24/20 11:37 PM, arch user via arch-general wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the package usbguard was flagged out of date in november. Three new
> versions came out since then. A package update or any info on this would
> be greatly appreciated.
>
> Kind regards
>
The trust chain is broken as the signin
On October 7, 2020 11:58:52 PM GMT+02:00, karx via arch-general
wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:05 PM Jayesh Badwaik via arch-general <
>arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>How long has the updated version been available? If it was just
>released
>then it will take some time for it to get packag
Checking the bug tracker should be the first spot to look for an answer
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68601
Local files got mixed after the test build as the tree contained a rebuild
bump. Just wait for -3 hitting the repos and upgrade to it.
Cheers
20 matches
Mail list logo
