Hi everyone,
I did a snort instalation using the package from extra, but i got some
problems. The package does not works after a fresh install. The
problems are:
- There are some problematic links with /usr/src/lib/snort_*
- The conf /etc/snort/snort.conf doesn't load the rules, because the
rules
atus[0]=open&percent[0]=&opened=&dev=&closed=&duedatefrom=&duedateto=&changedfrom=&changedto=&openedfrom=&openedto=&closedfrom=&closedto=
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Angel Velásquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at
Yeah! I don't know if its only a coincidence, but we made the jre from
the sources a week ago, also posting in Sun's bugtracker. So, i'm
think if it had some influense (crazy thoughts)... =)
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Geoffroy Carrier
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 23:19, Amanai wrote:
>
Amanai,
The question: do you use any packages from community repo?
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Amanai wrote:
>
>>
>> Why not just installing the xpi-file for Firefox directly from the mono
>> project? It works really great. Ok, it's not compiled from source, but
>> it's available for i586 a
I think the problem isn't the Rails, but the Gems. Until I know, Rails
2.2.2 are compatible with Ruby 1.9. But some developers don't upgrade
their gems code to work with Ruby 1.9.X, so, sometimes apps will break
with a upgrade. But, it depends only from developers of used gems.
--
Kessia Pinheiro
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Ondřej Kučera wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> True. But at the end of the day it goes down to works/doesn't work as a
> whole and as long as the gems used by Rails are broken, Rails are
> effectively broken too. :-(
>
> Ondřej
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Ondřej Kučera
True, b
Hi,
Maintain both version only depends of the developer, he'll maintain
both? And it can broke any actual package?
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Ondřej Kučera wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> We can alway have a ruby package and a ruby18 package at a later date,
>> much like what will happen when I make pyth
Hi all,
I'm doing a recompile of ruby for version 1.9. The needed are, in that order:
- recompile ruby to version 1.9 (no change)
- recompile vi and vim [applying the new patch's until version 108,
arch today only apply 65] and applying a patch for make compatible
with ruby1.9, it's done already.
I forgot, need recompile gvim too, obvious.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Kessia 'even' Pinheiro
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm doing a recompile of ruby for version 1.9. The needed are, in that order:
>
> - recompile ruby to version 1.9 (no change)
> - recom
I sent a mail right now for him, i'was clean up the build tree. Thanks
for remember me.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 01:29:28PM -0300, Kessia 'even' Pinheiro wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm doing a reco
I had that once. Only works after a manual reboot.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Leonid Grinberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Every once in a while -- not too frequently to be unusable, but
> certainly enough to be annoying -- the keyboard in KDE will simply
> lock up. Mouse will still work fine, and ke
Hi Alper!
Here in Brazil we are planning some like that for the FISL (Internation
Forum of Open Software - Fórum Internacional de Software Livre) at June
24-27. Me and Hugo Doria are planning a lecture for that, and a Arch Linux
user group, which have a space for all interested in our distro. If an
Mauricio,
I'm from Brazil too, part of Arch Linux Brasil team. Please, shows up in
#archlinux-br at irc.freenode.org, maybe anyone can help you more fast. If
not, came to archlinux-br list at google groups.
Best.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 8:44 PM, richard terry wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:26:
Hi all,
Tobias, i`m without a machine, so, i can`t check the vim version. Did you
compile new vim with witch version of ruby?
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Thomas Bohn wrote:
> On 2009-05-05 00:22 -0700, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
>
> > Finally, the new vi* packages are up.
>
> One more question
Allan,
Ruby 1.9 can be supported by VIM with a patch which I sent to Tobias months
ago. I submitted to vim-devel, but without response.
If anyone want this patch (vim support to ruby 1.9) I will be happy to send.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Caină wrote:
>
>> It also la
15 matches
Mail list logo
