Re: [arch-general] New 64 bit computer

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Baho Utot wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 02:57 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Baho Utot wrote: >> > I am gathering info on this new system >> > >> > I just bought a new computer ($550US

Re: [arch-general] KDE4.3 Beta - Rocks, still a bit rough, but very usable as a primary desktop

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:39 PM, David C. Rankin < drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote: > Pierre Schmitz wrote: > >> On Wednesday 10 June 2009 09:22:55 David C. Rankin wrote: >> >>> Now where can I get 4.3 Beta for Arch? or at least a good >>> howto on how to download the build dependencies need

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] status of vi/vim in testing

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Am Mittwoch 17 Juni 2009 schrieb Allan McRae: > > Tobias Powalowski wrote: > > > Hi > > > just wondered, what is the status of vi/vim in testing, this one blocks > > > archboot from moving to extra, is there any progress of moving it to

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] status of vi/vim in testing

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > >> Am Mittwoch 17 Juni 2009 schrieb Allan McRae: >> > Tobias Powalowski wrote: >> > > Hi >> > > just wondered, what is the st

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] status of vi/vim in testing

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis > wrote: > > I would be in favour of building a vim package in [core] that includes > both > > a vi & vim binary > > or you mean symlinking vi to vim... wh

Re: [arch-general] bash 4.0 / readline 6.0 rebuilds

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote: > been using arch for a few months and generally good and current... but > I just noticed that it still hasn't moved to bash 4. I'm wondering > what the status of it is? and where it's being held up (searching the > bugtracker found nothing that

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] status of vi/vim in testing

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:11, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> No i dont mean symlinking vi to vim. >> Thats not an option. See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13239#comment39968 >> & downwards. >> I mean building

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] + help needed readline rebuilds

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Pierre Schmitz > wrote: > > On Thursday 18 June 2009 18:12:05 Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> I'm going to slowly work through these throughout the day, but if > >> someone can help, that'd be great. > >> > >> Let m

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [announcement draft] New module-init-tools changes modprobe configuration file location

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Allan McRae schrieb: > >> Thomas Bächler wrote: >> >>> The new module-init-tools 3.8 package changes the location of the >>> configuration file: /etc/modprobe.conf is no longer read, instead >>> /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf is used. Files w

Re: [arch-general] Holy Cow -- What happened to bash / vi??

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:26 AM, David C. Rankin < drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote: > Listmates, > >I updated to [testing] and now I am having strange behavior from > ... > Any partiular reason you did that? Its likely BOTH vi and bash are to blame as

Re: [arch-general] vi from testing has gone nuts - does not honor virc/~.virc settings

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:55 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On Monday 22 June 2009 02:36:26 am Allan McRae wrote: >> David C. Rankin wrote: >> > Listmates, Devs: >> > >> >     I upgraded to testing to test the new dmraid. As part of the upgrade, >> > vi >> > was changed in a BIG way. (I could hardl

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Preparing for libjpeg update

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Allan McRae wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This weekend should see the release of the first update for libjpeg in >> several years.  Everything remains API compatible so this should be >> just a simple rebuild...  of 130 packages from [extra

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Preparing for libjpeg update

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > And the 2.6 version is old and does not have the arch in the package file > name either...   Good spotting.  I really should fix that! > > Allan There was some request to remove that some time ago in the flyspray as the only 2 packages dependin

Re: [arch-general] AUR Search

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Andrei Thorp wrote: > Hello there! > > Today, I'd like to be all complainy about the AUR search feature. I > haven't really looked around, but are there plans to improve it? Or is > the solution just "use google with site://"? > > It seems to be kind of bad at find

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [announcement] kernel26 2.6.30 announcement draft

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:54:01 +0200 > schrieb Tobias Powalowski : > > > Am Sonntag 21 Juni 2009 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > > > On Sunday 21 June 2009 22:38:25 Tobias Powalowski wrote: > > > > - added SCHED_DEBUG=y > > > > > > What does this do

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [announcement] kernel26 2.6.30 announcement draft

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Andreas Radke schrieb: > >> Just a note. The "early" mkinitcpio way of Intel KMS is broken on my >> gf's system resulting in an instant reboot. "Late" kms way is still >> working. I had to use a rescue disc. >> >> Maybe more user will be af

<    1   2   3