Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

licking links, multiple tabs, etc... -- Bastian Beischer I. Physikalisches Institut B (RWTH Aachen) Sommerfeldstr. 14 52074 Aachen GERMANY Office: 28-C-203 Phone: +49 241 - 8027205

Re: [arch-general] usb webcam no audio

ce driver uvcvideo > [11607.134943] USB Video Class driver (v1.0.0) > [11607.197743] 2:3:1: cannot get freq at ep 0x84 > [11607.198679] usbcore: registered new interface driver snd-usb-audio > [11607.251849] 2:3:1: cannot get freq at ep 0x84 > [11607.276979] 2:3:1: cannot get freq at ep 0x84 > [11643.290970] 2:3:1: cannot get freq at ep 0x84 > -- Bastian Beischer I. Physikalisches Institut B (RWTH Aachen) Sommerfeldstr. 14 52074 Aachen GERMANY Office: 28-C-203 Phone: +49 241 - 8027205

Re: [arch-general] git bisect module against -ARCH kernel

ly guess is that this has something to do with a version string > somewhere, but I kept assuring it was 2.6.39 in Makefile (no extraversion). > > Any other ideas? > > > [1] > https://bbs.archlinux.org/**viewtopic.php?id=121607<https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=1216

Re: [arch-general] iptables forward policy

re. I'm I right on this? >> >> You're wrong. Either a packet goes through the INPUT chain or it goes >> through the FORWARD chain, depending on its destination. Take a look >> at this packet flow diagram: >> http://www.linuxhomenetworking.com/wiki/images/f/

Re: [arch-general] kernel 3.6 feedback

intel 6300 wifi (lenovo w520). >> > > What hardware (processor/graphics/architecture) was the machine that > had the boot problem with 3.6? Maybe anyone else with the same > hardware might be able to confirm if a similar problem has been seen? > Might just help. > > --

Re: [arch-general] Emacs package is too stable?

ding with the AUR > package is quite a pain. > The stable releases that is available in the extras repo seem like an LTS > release. > Any plans on packaging for the recent tag releases? > > Thanks, > Kwang > -- Bastian Beischer RWTH Aachen University of Technology

[arch-general] readline 7.0 rebuild for self-maintained packages

Dear all, I will need to rebuild some of my packages which I maintain myself for readline 7.0. Is there a reliable way to find out which packages need a rebuild? How was the rebuild list for the official repos made? Thanks Bastian -- Bastian Beischer RWTH Aachen University of Technology

Re: [arch-general] readline 7.0 rebuild for self-maintained packages

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 11/07/2016 06:59 PM, Bastian Beischer wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I will need to rebuild some of my packages which I maintain myself for > > readline 7.0. &

Re: [arch-general] gcc broken - Arch specific, applying optimization incorrectly - may explain unexplained problems

Hi David, On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 2:44 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > > On 03/13/2018 03:28 PM, mar77i via arch-general wrote: > > On 03/13/2018 02:17 AM, PkmX via arch-general wrote: > >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607 > > > > Pass -std=... to compiling the programi n question.

Re: [arch-general] xrandr with XPS 13" (3840x2160) HiDPI and 30" (2560x1600) LowDPI

Tyler, On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Tyler wrote: > > Try setting the QT_SCREEN_SCALE_FACTORS per display like this for > instance: > > QT_SCREEN_SCALE_FACTORS=eDP-1=2;DP-1=1;HDMI-1=1;DP-2=1;HDMI-2=1; > > I didn't even know that was possible. > > I tried with: QT_SCREEN_SCALE_FACTORS=eDP1=2,DP