On Wed 2008-03-26 16:46 , Jan de Groot wrote:
> [...]
> If patching is no longer allowed, get ready for a time where packages are
> stuck in testing for ages because upstream broke it. Get ready to run a distro
> that breaks your system on every pacman -Syu because upgrade paths are not
> handled.
s point out, so you may have a bit more help when
> troubleshooting problems, etc. Just as "de_DE" was available before,
> "en_US" will still be available to most programs.
Ze German Uber Alles!
--
Alessio Bolognino
Please send personal email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Publi
On Tue 2008-04-01 09:22 , bardo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ab morgen werden auch die Mailinglisten auf deutsch umgestellt. Ich
> > schlage vor ihr lernt ohne Babelfish deutsch zu sprechen.
>
> Keine Gegenstände aus dem Fenster werfen!
On Mon 2008-04-07 00:07 , Thomas Bächler wrote:
> RedShift schrieb:
>> Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>> I am hacking initscripts and can't quite decide on two issues:
>>>
>>> 1) I'd like to hardcode /dev/pts/ mounting in rc.sysinit.
>>
>> What's wrong with putting that in fstab? What if I don't want to ha
On Tue 2008-04-29 00:17 , Peter Galiovsky wrote:
> [...]
> I was just curious if there is any single place where, for example,
> changelogs for packages can be found.
>
> Maybe it could be created automatically from SVN log messages.
>
> (Yeah, I know, I can implement it if I really want it.)
Act
On Mon 2008-04-28 16:32 , Scott Horowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Alessio Bolognino
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually there is the support for packages' changelog, but few maintainers
> > write
> > them.
>
> Wouldn't chan
On Sun 2008-05-04 12:47 , Tino Reichardt wrote:
> * pyther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * Tino Reichardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Hello list,
> > >>
> > >> clamav should be updated.
> > >
> > > Why does the update of clamav take so long ?
> > >
> > > Should I build a new package ?
> >
On Thu 2008-05-08 10:06 , Ryan Sims wrote:
> We needn't get bogged down in another "is this the ARCH WAY?!?!"
> conversation here;
I swear I don't want to.
> I don't think it needs to be a policy decision. If
> neither Arch nor upstream want to deal with .desktop files (and they
> both seem to
On Thu 2008-05-15 21:33 , Mordechai Peller wrote:
> Jon Kristian Nilsen wrote:
>> well did you load the correct module then?
> If the module isn't included in the kernel, probably not. Which module
> should I have loaded?
>> What's the output of lspci ?
Err... not very useful.
Anyway, your webcam
On Mon 2008-05-19 11:22 , Justin Gx wrote:
> gan lu wrote:
> > I hope I can, or I will report a bug for tracking, thanks.
> >
>
> Not being able to translate the installer into your language proper does
> not qualify as a bug. It would be best if you left the bug tracker for
> tracking serious, *
On Thu 2008-05-22 11:09, Travis Willard wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Nigel Henry
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On my Fedora installs there is a GUI for stopping and starting services, and
> > also the option of using chkconfig on the CLI. On my Debian installs, I
> > installed sysv
There is a thing that I have never understood: we ship the Firefox
package not branded, for the well known issues with the licensing of the
artwork, and that's fine; but are we sure we can name that package
"firefox" ? If you ask it to me, I think we can not:
Mike Connor (a Mozilla guy :) said he
On Wed 2008-06-11 05:46, Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino wrote:
> There is a thing that I have never understood: we ship the Firefox
> package not branded, for the well known issues with the licensing of the
> artwork, and that's fine; but are we sure we can name that package
> "firefox" ? If you ask it
On Tue 2008-06-10 22:52, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Alessio Bolognino
> > [...]
>
> Sure we name our package firefox- after the binary named firefox
> contained within. When they fix their build process to name the
> unbranded binary differently,
On Wed 2008-06-11 18:05, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> I've a small dumb question.
> Why not use official branded version when there are many licensing
> problems? According to KISS and Arch philosophy (use upstream apps and
> not to patch unless necessary) this should be a good way.
But what happens i
On Wed 2008-06-11 11:28, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Alessio Bolognino
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed 2008-06-11 18:05, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> >> I've a small dumb question.
> >> Why not use official bran
I recall a recent thread in arch-dev-public about a new policy about
info docs; I think devs decided to include info docs in the new
packages, but I'm not 100% sure.
--
Alessio (molok) Bolognino
Please send personal email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Key http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=ge
On Wed 2008-06-18 22:59, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 00:10 +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> > Hi, All!
> >
> > I forgot which decision was made about ion3
> >
> > Can I add it into community if I'll update it quickly?
>
> If you get ill (yes, getting a real life is what we call ill
On Thu 2008-06-19 08:52, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
> FTR, 3.0rc2 is 3.0
IIRC 3.0rc3 is 3.0
--
Alessio (molok) Bolognino
Please send personal email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Key http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xFE0270FB
GPG Key ID = 1024D / FE0270FB 2007-04-11
Key Fingerprint
On Wed 2008-06-18 21:39, Jeffrey Parke wrote:
> Patrick Burroughs wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 19:04, Alessio Bolognino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu 2008-06-19 08:52, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
>>>
>>>> FT
On Mon 2008-06-23 18:48, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
> On Monday 23 June 2008 16:59:30 Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > I agree with Simo and Jan here. While we could easily take the "do it
> > yourself" road, I always preferred the "sane defaults" side of Arch,
> > myself. That is - install some crap an
On Mon 2008-06-23 16:23, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Anyone else use the Firebug extension for Firefox? Seems like the old
> version (1.05) isn't compatible with FF3.0. But I'm also unable to
> upgrade to the new version (1.2.0b3). The extension home page
> (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-U
On Mon 2008-06-23 23:23, Nigel Henry wrote:
> I'm just about to update one of my 2 instances of Don't Panic. Firefox 3 is
> going to be installed. I'd had problems playing a radio stream from a radio
> station in the Channel Islands using Bon Echo, so downloaded and installed
> another instance
On Tue 2008-07-08 23:38, RedShift wrote:
> Thomas Bächler wrote:
> [...]
>> Now, again, you gave me a list of ideological reasons not to do it, but
>> where exactly is the point where this damages your "pure" system
>> technically?
>
> It's about the technical purity. It's this that makes us dif
On Tue 2008-07-15 17:43, Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat wrote:
> Hello. It seems that the url field of the gmp package is outdated -gives a
> 404 error-. The right link is http://gmplib.org/
It would be better to submit bug reports in the bug-tracker:
http://bugs.archlinux.org
In this way people can com
On Wed 2008-07-30 17:18, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> > The KDEmod repo is a possibility. A couple of things give me pause about
> > using it though: 1) it's not really "stock" KDE packages; they're split
> > into modules; they're heavily patched; etc., and
>
> Just to clarify, KDEmod uses only 2 patc
On Fri 2008-08-29 23:42, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Freitag 29 August 2008 12:27:50 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> > - nano Do we really need another editor in base? Let's leave it in
> > core, remove it from base.
>
> This might end up in a flamwar, but if we have to remove one editor I
> would vote v
On Sat 2008-08-30 17:52, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> lördagen den 30 augusti 2008 skrev Alessio Bolognino:
>
> > > This might end up in a flamwar, but if we have to remove one editor I
> > > would vote vor vim and keep nano. [... more nonsense ]
> >
> >
On Sun 2008-08-31 20:37, Jan de Groot wrote:
> Xorg-server 1.5RC6 (1.4.99.906) enters tesing. This version of
> xorg-server includes input hotplugging using hal, better EXA support and
> less memory usage.
> Note that this version requires an upgrade of all videodrivers.
> All videodrivers shipped
On Thu 2008-09-11 14:48, Hugo Doria wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> [...]
> And, please, tell me what you think about this. Any suggestion is welcome.
You may want to remove the "dashed" border, it's fugly :)
--
Alessio (molok) Bolognino
pgpCqsDhYephA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue 2008-10-21 16:46, Henri Häkkinen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a dependency problem in the avahi package? Avahi got installed as a
> dependency of VLC in my system and now I am geting this error message when
> running `pkg-config --list-all`:
>
> Package qt-mt was not found in the pkg-confi
31 matches
Mail list logo
