Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
There are some known issues (which are not critical, just avoid them
or live with them). Here are the biggest ones (for more, see TODO)
- don't remove lvm LV's if you have more then one in one lvm VG. So
think before you create :-)
- make the correct devicemapper device
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Dienstag 16 Dezember 2008 16:55:33 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>> I got an email today saying that the repo maintenance emails are kinda
>> spammy on the arch-dev-public list. What do you guys think about
>> moving it off to another list. Eith
2008/12/16 Anton :
> Good day.
>
> I'm going to compile all needed packages for archlinux. There are many source
> mirrors at the net not only
> URLs from PKGBUILD. Usually it is "distfiles" dir from gentoo or freebsd. It
> contains sources for their
> ports. I want use this sources.
>
> How can
Good day.
I'm going to compile all needed packages for archlinux. There are many source
mirrors at the net not only
URLs from PKGBUILD. Usually it is "distfiles" dir from gentoo or freebsd. It
contains sources for their
ports. I want use this sources.
How can I to make makepkg to look for sourc
The earlier (unstable) build from Sun Java SE Update 12 Build 02 have now
full 64 bit broswer support. Finally Sun have make it.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 23:19, Amanai wrote:
> The earlier (unstable) build from Sun Java SE Update 12 Build 02 have now
> full 64 bit broswer support. Finally Sun have make it.
VERY nice event :)
I have exams this week. I'll do my job right after.
--
Geoffroy Carrier
2008/12/6 Ondřej Kučera :
> I think one of two things should happen.
> (a) Someone (ideally just one person) - a dev I mean - will adopt azureus
> again, rename it to vuze and update it to the latest version, alongside with
> swt. Then the vuze package in unsupported can be deleted.
> (b) Both azur
Hi,
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
2008/12/6 Ondřej Kučera :
I think one of two things should happen.
(a) Someone (ideally just one person) - a dev I mean - will adopt azureus
again, rename it to vuze and update it to the latest version, alongside with
swt. Then the vuze package in unsupported can be d
Yeah! I don't know if its only a coincidence, but we made the jre from
the sources a week ago, also posting in Sun's bugtracker. So, i'm
think if it had some influense (crazy thoughts)... =)
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Geoffroy Carrier
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 23:19, Amanai wrote:
>
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:28:55 +0600
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> 2008/12/16 Anton :
> > Good day.
> >
> > I'm going to compile all needed packages for archlinux. There are many
> > source mirrors at the net not only
> > URLs from PKGBUILD. Usually it is "distfiles" dir from gentoo or freebsd.
> > It
Anton wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:28:55 +0600
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
2008/12/16 Anton :
Good day.
I'm going to compile all needed packages for archlinux. There are many source
mirrors at the net not only
URLs from PKGBUILD. Usually it is "distfiles" dir from gentoo or freebsd. It
11 matches
Mail list logo