On Feb 17, 2012 7:24 AM, "Fons Adriaensen" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:12:02AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> > "Run 'pacman -Syu' and try again."
> >
> > But you ignored it:
> >
> > "I've no intention to do a full system upgrade ATM"
>
> I did not ignore it, I gave some reasons why that
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:24:28 +
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:12:02AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> > "Run 'pacman -Syu' and try again."
> >
> > But you ignored it:
> >
> > "I've no intention to do a full system upgrade ATM"
>
> I did not ignore it, I gave some reason
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:12:02AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> "Run 'pacman -Syu' and try again."
>
> But you ignored it:
>
> "I've no intention to do a full system upgrade ATM"
I did not ignore it, I gave some reasons why that was
not an option at that time. And those reasons are in
line with
On 17/02/12 09:05, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> Apperently just expecting people to read a post before replying is
> asking too much. I did a 'pacman -Sy' before anything else. It would
> really help if the Arch gods would *read* and *try to understand* a
> request for help on this list before emittin
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:12:47PM -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Simply put there are 2 pkg trees: in the official repos and on your system.
> They are supposed to be in-sync -- that's what pacman -Sy does. pacman -S
> fetches pkg according to YOUR tree. Over time the sync is lost, so YOUR tree
>
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:52:27 +
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:41:53PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Fons Adriaensen
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Because it is apparently a dependency of octave. And pacman tried to
> > > install it, but fa
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> But again: the problem is that one library *fails to install*,
> even if the package database is up to date, and even if I try
> to install it explicitly.
How did you try to update curl and what errors are you getting? Sorry
if you alread
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:55:22PM +0100, Alexandre Ferrando wrote:
> On 16 February 2012 22:52, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>
> > Could you elaborate a bit on that ? Isn't 'pacman -S foo' supposed
> > to either install (if not yet installed) or update any dependencies
> > of 'foo' ? That anyway is w
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:41:53PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Fons Adriaensen
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Because it is apparently a dependency of octave. And pacman tried to
>> > install it, but failed du
On 16 February 2012 22:52, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> Could you elaborate a bit on that ? Isn't 'pacman -S foo' supposed
> to either install (if not yet installed) or update any dependencies
> of 'foo' ? That anyway is what apperently it has done for the last
> three years I've been using it...
T
Try to change mirror and do pacman -Syy.
2012/2/16 Fons Adriaensen
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:41:53PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Fons Adriaensen
> wrote:
> >
> > > Because it is apparently a dependency of octave. And pacman tried to
> > > install it,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:41:53PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>
> > Because it is apparently a dependency of octave. And pacman tried to
> > install it, but failed due to the 'no version information'.
>
> 'pacman -S foo' doesn't work
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:22:51PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Fons Adriaensen
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:49 PM,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:22:51PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Fons Adriaensen
> >> wrote:
> >> > I tried to install octave (aft
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>> > I tried to install octave (after a pacman -Sy).
>>
>> Run 'pacman -Syu' and try again.
>
> I've no intention
You MUST always do a full systen upgrade before installing a package. Do
it. If it wont help then try to email again.
On 16 February 2012 22:04, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> I've no intention to do a full system upgrade ATM, nor should
> it be necessary. The problem is not that the missing lib is
> out of date but that pacman apparently can't get it.
That's exactly why you need to do a full system update. Partial
up
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > I tried to install octave (after a pacman -Sy).
>
> Run 'pacman -Syu' and try again.
I've no intention to do a full system upgrade ATM, nor should
it be necessary. The p
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> I tried to install octave (after a pacman -Sy).
Run 'pacman -Syu' and try again.
19 matches
Mail list logo
