On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:37:28AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> shouldn't we completely delete the ABS wiki?
>
You are confusing the ABS the tool with ABS the build system.
--
Morten Linderud
PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16
asynchronous inode failure.
cheers!
mar77i
Joking apart.
Building "some" sourceforge related package provided by ABS works
without issues [1].
Regards,
Ralf
[1]
[rocketmouse@archlinux tmp]$ cp -a /var/abs/community/qtractor/ .
[rocketmouse@archlinux tmp]$ cd qtractor/
[rocketmouse@archlinux qtractor]$ grep sourceforge PKGBUILD
url="http
Op 23 nov. 2016 23:43 schreef "Ralf Mardorf" :
>
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 21:01:11 + (GMT), piequiex wrote:
> >This is what I got from sourceforge while trying to build some packet.
>
> Please, don't send emails with that much details. Next time consider to
> send a more vague email, with less det
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 21:01:11 + (GMT), piequiex wrote:
>This is what I got from sourceforge while trying to build some packet.
Please, don't send emails with that much details. Next time consider to
send a more vague email, with less details. Most subscribers are
psychic and like to face challe
In general it makes no sense to sign messages send to a mailing list,
but I don't want to discuss this, I'm aware that some people have
bizarre arguments, why signing mails to mailing lists makes sense.
Anyway, if you send a signed message, than please use a format averaged
MUAs support by default.
- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Wed, 26 Aug 2015 23:18:05 +0100 (BST)
> flow :
>=20
> > Still can't find out yet where is avaible libreoffice-fresh 4.4.5-1
>=20
> https://projects.archlinux.org
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:18 PM, flow wrote:
> Still can't find out yet where is avaible libreoffice-fresh 4.4.5-1
>
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Rollback_Machine
https://seblu.net/a/arm/packages/l/libreoffice-fresh/
-- Eli Schwartz
Wed, 26 Aug 2015 23:18:05 +0100 (BST)
flow :
> Still can't find out yet where is avaible libreoffice-fresh 4.4.5-1
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/snapshot/packages-5cfa49f17e4149dc4d7d2d6aec2cbd11310a8b04.tar.gz
Found through exactly the same steps as described earlier.
Do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 03:05:14 +0200
> Jens Adam wrote:
>
> > > Where I can get old ABS content?
>
> Flow, you can get it through SVN or the Git mirror. Info should be in the
> wiki.
Still can't find out yet where is avaible libreoffice-fresh 4.4.
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 03:05:14 +0200
Jens Adam wrote:
> Tue, 25 Aug 2015 01:44:38 +0100 (BST)
> flow :
>
> > Where I can get old ABS content?
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Git_repositories_for_AUR3_packages
>
> --byte
ABS != AUR
Flow, you can get it through SVN
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 03:05:14 +0200
Jens Adam :
> Tue, 25 Aug 2015 01:44:38 +0100 (BST)
> flow :
>
> > Where I can get old ABS content?
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Git_repositories_for_AUR3_packages
>
> --byte
Err .. "ABS", yeah, sorry.
If you got a specific pack
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 01:44:38 +0100 (BST)
flow :
> Where I can get old ABS content?
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Git_repositories_for_AUR3_packages
--byte
pgpmDUwspY8Kr.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
Thanks everyone for the illuminating responses. IgnorePackage and
IgnoreGroup seem to be what I need, after all.
Cheers,
Manolo
On 09/26/12 at 09:10am, gt wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:09:59PM -0400, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've just had a minor hiccup, because one of th
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Zeke Sulastin wrote:
>> Many times these tweaks are temporary and, indeed, newer versions make
>> them unnecessary. It can definitely be done as you suggest, but I think
>> it'd be in the spirit of the help provided by, e.g., .pacsave and .pacnew
>> files, to have
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:09:59PM -0400, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just had a minor hiccup, because one of the packages updated in my
> pacman -Syu this morning substituted a version I had tweaked the ABS
> way.
>
> Nothing serious, as I say, and wholly my fault, but yet I was
>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:34:37PM -0400, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> On 09/25/12 at 08:16pm, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Manolo Martínez
> > wrote:
> > > Would it be possible/make sense to have pacman inform us whenever it is
> > > going to
> > > substitute a package
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Manolo Martínez
wrote:
> On 09/25/12 at 08:16pm, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Manolo Martínez
>> wrote:
>> > Would it be possible/make sense to have pacman inform us whenever it is
>> > going to
>> > substitute a package that has bee
> Many times these tweaks are temporary and, indeed, newer versions make
> them unnecessary. It can definitely be done as you suggest, but I think
> it'd be in the spirit of the help provided by, e.g., .pacsave and .pacnew
> files, to have pacman issue a warning.
> --
Pacman doesn't really have a
On 09/25/12 at 08:16pm, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Manolo Martínez
> wrote:
> > Would it be possible/make sense to have pacman inform us whenever it is
> > going to
> > substitute a package that has been ABS'd?
>
> Why not put your tweaked packages in 'IgnorePkg' i
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Manolo Martínez
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just had a minor hiccup, because one of the packages updated in my
> pacman -Syu this morning substituted a version I had tweaked the ABS
> way.
>
> Nothing serious, as I say, and wholly my fault, but yet I was
> wondering:
On 12/01/12 20:16, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Mauro Santos
> wrote:
>> On 12-01-2012 10:07, Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote:
>>>
>>> Might be related to this:
>>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-January/022378.html
>>>
>> But I'm using x86_64 an
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Mauro Santos
wrote:
> On 12-01-2012 10:07, Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote:
>>
>> Might be related to this:
>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-January/022378.html
>>
> But I'm using x86_64 and if anything it should be i686 that got affected
>
On 12-01-2012 10:07, Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote:
>
> Might be related to this:
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-January/022378.html
>
But I'm using x86_64 and if anything it should be i686 that got affected
I suppose.
--
Mauro Santos
Mauro Santos (2012-01-12 09:58):
> I have just updated the ABS tree and the [community] and [multilib]
> directories are missing, is this intentional or a problem?
>
> grep -v ^# /etc/abs.conf | grep -v ^$
> [ "$ABSROOT" = "" ] && ABSROOT="/var/abs/"
> SYNCSERVER="rsync.archlinux.org"
> ARCH="x86_
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 14/11/10 03:23, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>>
>>> PKGBUILDs don't get multiple commits by multiple
>>> contributors to the extent software projects do, where GIT would make
>>> sense.
On 14/11/10 03:23, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
PKGBUILDs don't get multiple commits by multiple
contributors to the extent software projects do, where GIT would make
sense.
they will in time my friend, if i get my way :-) this is a goal i am
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 13 November 2010 06:13, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 3:56 PM, csgeek wrote:
>>> Somewhat related question
>>>
>>> I've seen a few places deploy git based build systems.
>>>
>>> funtoo (re-implementation of gento
On 13 November 2010 06:13, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 3:56 PM, csgeek wrote:
>> Somewhat related question
>>
>> I've seen a few places deploy git based build systems.
>>
>> funtoo (re-implementation of gentoo's portage but git based) and the arch
>> based that was lin
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 3:56 PM, csgeek wrote:
> Somewhat related question
>
> I've seen a few places deploy git based build systems.
>
> funtoo (re-implementation of gentoo's portage but git based) and the arch
> based that was linked above.
>
> I'm just curious.. at some point wouldn't that
Somewhat related question
I've seen a few places deploy git based build systems.
funtoo (re-implementation of gentoo's portage but git based) and the arch
based that was linked above.
I'm just curious.. at some point wouldn't that just create excessive history
that's not needed? Do you real
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:59:20PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> Wasn't there a successor or replacement to abs in the works? A git-based
> one, I believe? (maybe I'm creating false memories?)
>
> On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 16:40 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Perhaps you were thinking of:
https://github.co
On 06/11/10 20:59, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Wasn't there a successor or replacement to abs in the works? A git-based
one, I believe? (maybe I'm creating false memories?)
Umm... not that I ever heard of.
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 21:46 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Fixed.
Indeed, and quickly too. Thanks!
On 12/07/10 21:24, Allan McRae wrote:
On 12/07/10 21:14, ProfessorTomoe wrote:
I tried to pull down an abs update a few minutes ago and wound up
getting everything but the "community," "any," and "local" directories
completely removed from my /var/abs directory. I deleted and re-updated
a few mi
On 12/07/10 21:14, ProfessorTomoe wrote:
I tried to pull down an abs update a few minutes ago and wound up
getting everything but the "community," "any," and "local" directories
completely removed from my /var/abs directory. I deleted and re-updated
a few minutes later but still got nothing but
Ray Kohler wrote:
The PKGBUILD at /var/abs/extra/postgresql-libs has version 8.4.0-1 (a
version that was in testing a little while back), while the version in
extra is still 8.3.7-2. This seems very dangerous since it would be
easy for a non-testing user to give themselves an unintended soname
bu
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:13, Allan McRae wrote:
> Sascha Siegel wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> "sudo abs" deletes the repos core, extra and testing and creates
>> "comunity" AND "community".
>> i think theres something wrong with the abs-sync.
>>
>> /etc/abs.conf says: REPOS=(core extra community testing
Sascha Siegel wrote:
hi,
"sudo abs" deletes the repos core, extra and testing and creates
"comunity" AND "community".
i think theres something wrong with the abs-sync.
/etc/abs.conf says: REPOS=(core extra community testing)
but ls on /var/abs sais: community comunity local README
tryed d
39 matches
Mail list logo
