On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
> I'm totally missing something here since I haven't found Wayland as a required
> dependency for libgdk-3 on the other two distributions I was working with.
I guess what you are missing is the fact that wayland is optional at
compile-time,
On 16 February 2013 13:36, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Jan Steffens
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Martín Cigorraga
> wrote:
> >> Sorry for the 'molehill' kid, but Cai's still right, isn't him?
> >
> > No, he is not. libgdk-3 links against wayland l
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
>> Sorry for the 'molehill' kid, but Cai's still right, isn't him?
>
> No, he is not. libgdk-3 links against wayland libraries. It will not
> run without those installed, independent of
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
> Sorry for the 'molehill' kid, but Cai's still right, isn't him?
No, he is not. libgdk-3 links against wayland libraries. It will not
run without those installed, independent of the actual backend used.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Cai Iru wrote:
> > I just saw that wayland is a dependency of gtk3 in [testing] repo. Can
> > wayland be just an OPTIONAL dependency?
>
> No. And please don't make mountains out of molehills - wayland is ju
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Cai Iru wrote:
> I just saw that wayland is a dependency of gtk3 in [testing] repo. Can
> wayland be just an OPTIONAL dependency?
No. And please don't make mountains out of molehills - wayland is just
a 580KiB library.
2013/2/14 Sébastien Luttringer
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> > On 02/12/2013 05:51 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Andreas Radke
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Am Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:35:27 +0100
> >>> schrieb Andreas Radke :
> >>>
> Since
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 05:51 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Andreas Radke
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:35:27 +0100
>>> schrieb Andreas Radke :
>>>
Since cairo will also depend on that libegl then every syst
On 02/12/2013 05:51 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
Am Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:35:27 +0100
schrieb Andreas Radke :
Since cairo will also depend on that libegl then every system will
pull in Wayland. Is this really needed? If we can't build it in a
dif
Le dimanche 10 février 2013 04:11:36 William Giokas a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:03:07AM +0100, Andreas Radke wrote:
> > Am Sun, 10 Feb 2013 03:51:47 -0600
> >
> > schrieb William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com>:
> > > I'm getting pkg-config errors too, but for totally unrelated packages,
> >
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:03:07AM +0100, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Sun, 10 Feb 2013 03:51:47 -0600
> schrieb William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com>:
>
> > I'm getting pkg-config errors too, but for totally unrelated packages,
> > like webkit-1.0. Downgrading cairo to [core] fixes that for me (and
> >
Am Sun, 10 Feb 2013 03:51:47 -0600
schrieb William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com>:
> I'm getting pkg-config errors too, but for totally unrelated packages,
> like webkit-1.0. Downgrading cairo to [core] fixes that for me (and
> allows me to build things again) but the one in testing somehow breaks
> p
Dana 9.2.2013 17:35, Andreas Radke je napisao:
Now that Wayland has landed in Community I can build Mesa with support
for Wayland. This leads to a new dependency in libegl:
libegl E: Dependency wayland detected and not included (libraries
['usr/lib/libwayland-server.so.0', 'usr/lib/libwayland-cl
[2013-02-08 09:13:20 +0800] Oon-Ee Ng:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> > [2013-02-08 01:23:30 +0100] Sébastien Luttringer:
> >> [4] I'm already existed by arch-general be closed again
> >
> > I cannot make sense of that sentence...
> >
> s/existed/excited then it makes muc
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2013-02-08 01:23:30 +0100] Sébastien Luttringer:
>> [4] I'm already existed by arch-general be closed again
>
> I cannot make sense of that sentence...
>
s/existed/excited then it makes much more sense =)
15 matches
Mail list logo
