On 02/15/2010 11:39 PM, gt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>
>
>> IMAP doesn't delete mails from mail server. You can use IMAP on multiple
>> machines.
>>
>>
> He probably meant that it isn't feasible to maintain mailing clients on
> multiple machines.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>
> IMAP doesn't delete mails from mail server. You can use IMAP on multiple
> machines.
>
He probably meant that it isn't feasible to maintain mailing clients on
multiple machines. but anyway, gotta love IMAP (saying this while using w
On 02/16/2010 10:16 AM, Otávio Módolo wrote:
2010/2/16 Nilesh Govindarajan
On 02/16/2010 08:02 AM, gt wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Otávio Módolo
wrote:
T.T
sorry for that, i'm going back to silence again. cya
Again with Top posting :D
Better use some IMAP client wit
2010/2/16 Nilesh Govindarajan
> On 02/16/2010 08:02 AM, gt wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Otávio Módolo
>> wrote:
>>
>> T.T
>>>
>>> sorry for that, i'm going back to silence again. cya
>>>
>>>
>>> Again with Top posting :D
>>
>
> Better use some IMAP client with gmail. I suggest
On 02/16/2010 08:02 AM, gt wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Otávio Módolo wrote:
T.T
sorry for that, i'm going back to silence again. cya
Again with Top posting :D
Better use some IMAP client with gmail. I suggest Thunderbird or Claws Mail.
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site & Server A
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Otávio Módolo wrote:
> T.T
>
> sorry for that, i'm going back to silence again. cya
>
>
Again with Top posting :D
T.T
sorry for that, i'm going back to silence again. cya
2010/2/15 Ionut Biru
> On 02/15/2010 07:12 PM, Otávio Módolo wrote:
>
>> i don't really asked for it. don't misunderstand things.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/2/15 Ionut Biru
>>
>> On 02/15/2010 07:05 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/15
On 02/15/2010 12:22 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 02/15/2010 07:12 PM, Otávio Módolo wrote:
i don't really asked for it. don't misunderstand things.
2010/2/15 Ionut Biru
On 02/15/2010 07:05 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 02/15/2010 10:31 PM, Otávio Módolo wrote:
really don't know if this
On 02/15/2010 07:12 PM, Otávio Módolo wrote:
i don't really asked for it. don't misunderstand things.
2010/2/15 Ionut Biru
On 02/15/2010 07:05 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 02/15/2010 10:31 PM, Otávio Módolo wrote:
really don't know if this kernel is in the arch repos but it's good
i
i don't really asked for it. don't misunderstand things.
2010/2/15 Ionut Biru
> On 02/15/2010 07:05 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>
>> On 02/15/2010 10:31 PM, Otávio Módolo wrote:
>>
>>> really don't know if this kernel is in the arch repos but it's good
>>> idea to
>>> put it there. this ker
On 02/15/2010 07:05 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 02/15/2010 10:31 PM, Otávio Módolo wrote:
really don't know if this kernel is in the arch repos but it's good
idea to
put it there. this kernel is a fork-like from the normal kernel but
specific
for desktops.
the site: http://zen-kernel.org/
On 02/15/2010 10:31 PM, Otávio Módolo wrote:
really don't know if this kernel is in the arch repos but it's good idea to
put it there. this kernel is a fork-like from the normal kernel but specific
for desktops.
the site: http://zen-kernel.org/
Its already there in AUR - kernel26zen
--
Niles
really don't know if this kernel is in the arch repos but it's good idea to
put it there. this kernel is a fork-like from the normal kernel but specific
for desktops.
the site: http://zen-kernel.org/
--
http://id.liquuid.net
13 matches
Mail list logo
