Re: [arch-general] VirtualBox-ose 2.0.2 broken

2008-09-23 Thread Jaime Oyarzun Knittel
Ángel Velásquez wrote: > Jaime Oyarzun Knittel ha scritto: [...] >> That's really obvious. In virtualbox *ose* thinks aren't working, >> > > You meant *things* ;) Haha, can't get used to this language yet :) >> however I think I solved it, I'll check it during the morning. >> >> > Let us k

Re: [arch-general] VirtualBox-ose 2.0.2 broken

2008-09-23 Thread Ángel Velásquez
Jaime Oyarzun Knittel ha scritto: Svein Tonning wrote: You need the module and adding the user to the group virtualbox. That's really obvious. In virtualbox *ose* thinks aren't working, You meant *things* ;) however I think I solved it, I'll check it during the morning. Let

Re: [arch-general] VirtualBox-ose 2.0.2 broken

2008-09-23 Thread Jaime Oyarzun Knittel
Svein Tonning wrote: > You need the module and adding the user to the group virtualbox. That's really obvious. In virtualbox *ose* thinks aren't working, however I think I solved it, I'll check it during the morning. -- Jaime Jose Oyarzun Knittel Estudiante Ingenieria Civil Informatica Universid

Re: [arch-general] VirtualBox-ose 2.0.2 broken

2008-09-23 Thread Svein Tonning
You need the module and adding the user to the group virtualbox. 2008/9/23 Geoffroy Carrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:26, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On my machine taht device is correctly created after inserting the >> vboxdrv module. > > Are you running virtualbox

Re: [arch-general] VirtualBox-ose 2.0.2 broken

2008-09-23 Thread Geoffroy Carrier
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:26, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On my machine taht device is correctly created after inserting the > vboxdrv module. Are you running virtualbox as root? Because that's the only way it works here. -- Geoffroy Carrier

Re: [arch-general] VirtualBox-ose 2.0.2 broken

2008-09-23 Thread bardo
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Jaime Oyarzun Knittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That solved the permissions issue, but it still can't find /dev/vboxdrv. On my machine taht device is correctly created after inserting the vboxdrv module. Corrado

Re: [arch-general] VirtualBox-ose 2.0.2 broken

2008-09-22 Thread Jaime Oyarzun Knittel
daniel g. siegel wrote: > if you are compiling it yourself, just add the --disable-hardening > flag. > > daniel > That solved the permissions issue, but it still can't find /dev/vboxdrv. This was reported in http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/2305. -- Jaime Jose Oyarzun Knittel Estudiante Inge

Re: [arch-general] VirtualBox-ose 2.0.2 broken

2008-09-22 Thread Geoffroy Carrier
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 16:23, daniel g. siegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if you are compiling it yourself, just add the --disable-hardening > flag. Already done. -- Geoffroy Carrier

Re: [arch-general] VirtualBox-ose 2.0.2 broken

2008-09-22 Thread daniel g. siegel
if you are compiling it yourself, just add the --disable-hardening flag. daniel On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:54 +0200, Geoffroy Carrier wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 15:52, Geoffroy Carrier > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now I have a new problem to solve, after a correction between 2.0.2-1 >

Re: [arch-general] VirtualBox-ose 2.0.2 broken

2008-09-22 Thread Geoffroy Carrier
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 15:52, Geoffroy Carrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now I have a new problem to solve, after a correction between 2.0.2-1 > and 2.0.2-2. > I submitted it to get more feedback, as I don't know exactly what's > going on now. To be more precise: it now works running as 'root'

Re: [arch-general] VirtualBox-ose 2.0.2 broken

2008-09-22 Thread Geoffroy Carrier
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 23:15, Jaime Oyarzun Knittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a workaround for this problem (I have not tried it), but does > anybody know when will this be solved in the repos? When I find the solution. There has been a communication issue between bash and I, so I didn

[arch-general] VirtualBox-ose 2.0.2 broken

2008-09-21 Thread Jaime Oyarzun Knittel
Hi! I (and some people too) have been experiencing problems with virtualbox-ose since it was upgraded to version 2.0.2. The problems are described here: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11528?project=5 and here: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=55406&p=1 There is a workaround for this