Am 18.05.2010 13:42, schrieb vlad:
> Though "-r" was set to "/mnt/root" the install script seems to update
> /etc/ssl/certs.
> I am not really sure if it actually applied to the new root "/mnt/root"
> or only to /etc/ssl. It was some time ago.
> I remember I reran "/usr/sbin/update-ca-certificates
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 09:26:51PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 18/05/10 21:21, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> >On 05/18/2010 03:34 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 03:17 -0400, Keith Hinton wrote:
> >>>Hi.
> >>>I've recently seen threads on this list pertaining to interesting
> >>>issu
Am 18.05.2010 13:26, schrieb Allan McRae:
>> What about the install scripts then? pacman -r (and -b) don't
>> necessarily assure that the install scripts behave properly.
>>
>
> Really... they should do.
There are certain problems if you don't create $BASE/dev/null beforehand
or bind-mount a fu
On 18/05/10 21:21, Matthew Monaco wrote:
On 05/18/2010 03:34 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 03:17 -0400, Keith Hinton wrote:
Hi.
I've recently seen threads on this list pertaining to interesting
issues with the Arch Linux core isos.
I haven't had that problem in my primary tests
On 05/18/2010 03:34 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 03:17 -0400, Keith Hinton wrote:
Hi.
I've recently seen threads on this list pertaining to interesting issues with
the Arch Linux core isos.
I haven't had that problem in my primary tests of those Isos in particular.
Is there any
Am 18.05.2010 11:56, schrieb Fons Adriaensen:
> I agree (with Ng Oon-Ee). In one of the situations I work in
> the install is going through an http proxy that systematically
> corrupts some packages (always the same, IIRC perl, man-pages,
> and another one)
Just a side remark: In my opinion, when
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:37:38PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Does anyone agree/disagree with my idea on the proper way to install Arch?
> > :D
> > Regards, --Keith
> >
> I disagree. Some of us do not have fast/reliable internet connections,
> and would rather postpone the search for reliable do
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Keith Hinton wrote:
> Hi.
> I've recently seen threads on this list pertaining to interesting issues with
> the Arch Linux core isos.
> I haven't had that problem in my primary tests of those Isos in particular.
> Is there any reason why a successful installation
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 03:17 -0400, Keith Hinton wrote:
> Hi.
> I've recently seen threads on this list pertaining to interesting issues with
> the Arch Linux core isos.
> I haven't had that problem in my primary tests of those Isos in particular.
> Is there any reason why a successful installation
Hi.
I've recently seen threads on this list pertaining to interesting issues with
the Arch Linux core isos.
I haven't had that problem in my primary tests of those Isos in particular.
Is there any reason why a successful installation may occur in one environment
over another? Or is this a common
10 matches
Mail list logo
