On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Keith Hinton <keithint1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
> I've recently seen threads on this list pertaining to interesting issues with
> the Arch Linux core isos.
> I haven't had that problem in my primary tests of those Isos in particular.
> Is there any reason why a successful installation may occur in one
> environment over another? Or is this a common Linux problem.
> Thanks for answering my question.
> I hope that the rest of you folks have successful Core installations, however
> a net-install is the only real way to isntall Arch Linux.
> I do not see the point of the core installer media, personally. Why would one
> wish to use that? A snapshot will become outdated in a flash, and all of you
> archers know this. As soon as a newer package version is available the entire
> snapshot is outdated instantly. Or will be, given a few
> weeks/months/years/whatever.
> I therefore have always installed from what I believe to be the Arch-Way,
> wich is installing via the Internet alone to have an updated system.
> Does anyone agree/disagree with my idea on the proper way to install Arch? :D
> Regards, --Keith
>
I disagree. Some of us do not have fast/reliable internet connections,
and would rather postpone the search for reliable download speeds till
after the machine is bare-bones working (can boot, has network,
basically has all of core) instead of in between the install process.
