On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 06:25, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
[...]
> Heh, I like OCaml, but I chose Python for a few reasons, one was so that
> more people could hack on it, I want it to be very modular, so for instance
> it will be possible to make a variety of modules to watch different SCM
> managers,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:10:34PM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> [..]
> > Yes, there sure is, there is a lot of backend code that I am working
> > on, but this is coming along!
> >
> > I am still as much as a few months out from having it
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:10:34PM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
[..]
> Yes, there sure is, there is a lot of backend code that I am working
> on, but this is coming along!
>
> I am still as much as a few months out from having it production
> ready, and I am a few weeks away from initial functiona
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Nicolás Reynolds wrote:
> El 27/01/11 10:36, Thomas S Hatch dijo:
> > I have mentioned this subject before on aur-general, but I wanted to open
> a
> > discussion about it in the broader community.
> >
> > I have spent a great deal of my career working with Red Ha
El 27/01/11 10:36, Thomas S Hatch dijo:
> I have mentioned this subject before on aur-general, but I wanted to open a
> discussion about it in the broader community.
>
> I have spent a great deal of my career working with Red Hat Linux, as have
> many in the professional Linux world, and there is
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Isaac Dupree <
> m...@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> wrote:
>
>> On 01/28/11 09:32, Jakob Gruber wrote:
>>
>>> Another aspect of this is security. Right now, any dev / TU could
>>> theoretically check in
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Isaac Dupree <
m...@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> wrote:
> On 01/28/11 09:32, Jakob Gruber wrote:
>
>> Another aspect of this is security. Right now, any dev / TU could
>> theoretically check in a correct PKGBUILD but upload a binary package
>> with *insert malicio
On 01/28/11 09:32, Jakob Gruber wrote:
Another aspect of this is security. Right now, any dev / TU could
theoretically check in a correct PKGBUILD but upload a binary package
with *insert malicious content* in it to the repos with a very low
probability of anyone ever noticing. A (mandatory) cent
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:49 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Thomas S Hatch
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:08 AM, C Anthony Risinger >wrote:
> >
> > But with that said I feel very strongly that my wants as a commercial
> user
> > of Arch are not on par w
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:08 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
> But with that said I feel very strongly that my wants as a commercial user
> of Arch are not on par with the needs of the Arch community in the manner,
> in fact I would say tha
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:08 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Thomas S Hatch
> wrote:
> >
> > Jakob, YES! You are spot on here, one of the main motivations behind a
> > system like this is security. While I don't think that this is a problem
> > with our developers
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
>
> Jakob, YES! You are spot on here, one of the main motivations behind a
> system like this is security. While I don't think that this is a problem
> with our developers, I do think that it is a potential future problem, Arch
> is continuing
Thanks Allan, I will look at pacbuild.
Jelle, as for AUR interactions, this would not be a primary use by any
means, I think that serving the core Arch repos would be top priority.
There are a lot of ideas about interacting with the AUR, but I think that
resource wise and logistically it should i
Another aspect of this is security. Right now, any dev / TU could
theoretically check in a correct PKGBUILD but upload a binary package
with *insert malicious content* in it to the repos with a very low
probability of anyone ever noticing. A (mandatory) central build server
could guarantee that
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 12:34 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:01 PM, C Anthony Risinger > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37 PM
Just as an FYI, have a look a the old pacbuild project:
http://projects.archlinux.org/pacbuild.git/
I have no idea how far along its development was, but it might give you
some ideas.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 28/01/11 03:36, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
>
>> I have been passively working on a similar project called quarters, but I
>> must admit that my motivation is somewhat low not knowing if the project
>> is
>> in demand. So here is my question, do
On 28/01/11 03:36, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
I have been passively working on a similar project called quarters, but I
must admit that my motivation is somewhat low not knowing if the project is
in demand. So here is my question, do we think that something like this
would be a benefit to Arch? Is thi
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Thomas S Hatch
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:57 PM, C Anthony Risinger >wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Thomas S Hatch
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Awesome, I actually have a few
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:57 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Thomas S Hatch
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Awesome, I actually have a few servers I will use, and since it will be
>> > distributed, we will be able t
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:57 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Thomas S Hatch
> wrote:
> >
> > Awesome, I actually have a few servers I will use, and since it will be
> > distributed, we will be able to use a lot of servers as builders all
> > reporting to a single
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
>
> Awesome, I actually have a few servers I will use, and since it will be
> distributed, we will be able to use a lot of servers as builders all
> reporting to a single master.
why all the distributed goodness, then a crippling single maste
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch
> wrote:
>
> > We have been discussing this in the TU chat, and there is a lot of
> > excitement about it, I am going to post some degign docs on the wiki here
> > in
> > a few days (give me s
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> We have been discussing this in the TU chat, and there is a lot of
> excitement about it, I am going to post some degign docs on the wiki here
> in
> a few days (give me some time to put it together :) ) and then we can have
> a
> free for
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:01 PM, C Anthony Risinger >wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Thomas S Hatch
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Ra
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:01 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Thomas S Hatch
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Ray Rashif
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 28 January 2011 01:36, Thomas S Hatch wr
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:01 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Thomas S Hatch
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Ray Rashif
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 28 January 2011 01:36, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> >> > I have been passively working on a similar project ca
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>
>> On 28 January 2011 01:36, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
>> > I have been passively working on a similar project called quarters, but I
>> > must admit that my motivation is somewhat low not
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 28 January 2011 01:36, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> > I have been passively working on a similar project called quarters, but I
> > must admit that my motivation is somewhat low not knowing if the project
> is
> > in demand. So here is my quest
On 28 January 2011 01:36, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> I have been passively working on a similar project called quarters, but I
> must admit that my motivation is somewhat low not knowing if the project is
> in demand. So here is my question, do we think that something like this
> would be a benefit t
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On 27/01/11 17:36, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I have been passively working on a similar project called quarters, but I
> > must admit that my motivation is somewhat low not knowing if the project
> is
> > in demand. So here is my
On 27/01/11 17:36, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
[...]
> I have been passively working on a similar project called quarters, but I
> must admit that my motivation is somewhat low not knowing if the project is
> in demand. So here is my question, do we think that something like this
> would be a benefit to
I have mentioned this subject before on aur-general, but I wanted to open a
discussion about it in the broader community.
I have spent a great deal of my career working with Red Hat Linux, as have
many in the professional Linux world, and there is one project that is
amazingly useful for the Red H
33 matches
Mail list logo
