On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:36 PM, b1 wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since I am just a comperativly inexperienced user, it took me some time
> to get pulseaudio working (Digging the forum to change the asound.conf,
> getting vlc to work with pulse by the aur-package).
> I think it would be great having a package g
Hi
Since I am just a comperativly inexperienced user, it took me some time
to get pulseaudio working (Digging the forum to change the asound.conf,
getting vlc to work with pulse by the aur-package).
I think it would be great having a package group, with which I could
install all this stuff at once
On 19/05/2010, Jan Steffens wrote:
> The problem with doing that is some packages will indeed have to
> *depend* and not just optdepend on PA.
There are some cases where you can get away with it when there is no
hard runtime dependency on the library in question. You can have them
as makedepends
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> The problem with doing that is some packages will indeed have to
> *depend* and not just optdepend on PA.
>
> PulseAudio installs some desktop files that causes it to autostart
> together with Gnome or KDE.
>
> The PA client library will star
The problem with doing that is some packages will indeed have to
*depend* and not just optdepend on PA.
PulseAudio installs some desktop files that causes it to autostart
together with Gnome or KDE.
The PA client library will start the PA server if it's not running,
instead of failing. That means
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> I could make PulseAudio installation significantly easier by putting
> specially-built packages (e.g. sdl-pulse, openal-pulse) into
> [community] and grouping them in a "pulse" group.
>
> This group would also include a "pulse-asoundrc" packag
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 00:25:41 Jan Steffens wrote:
> I could make PulseAudio installation significantly easier by putting
> specially-built packages (e.g. sdl-pulse, openal-pulse) into
> [community] and grouping them in a "pulse" group.
I think its a great idea to provide more "pulse" packages,
2010/5/19 Isaac Dupree :
> also I wonder why the group name to be "pulse" and not "pulseaudio".
This was an upstream decision.
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 18:44 -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> On 05/18/10 18:25, Jan Steffens wrote:
> > I could make PulseAudio installation significantly easier by putting
> > specially-built packages (e.g. sdl-pulse, openal-pulse) into
> > [community] and grouping them in a "pulse" group.
> >
> > Thi
On 05/18/10 18:25, Jan Steffens wrote:
I could make PulseAudio installation significantly easier by putting
specially-built packages (e.g. sdl-pulse, openal-pulse) into
[community] and grouping them in a "pulse" group.
This group would also include a "pulse-asoundrc" package containing a
pulse-c
I could make PulseAudio installation significantly easier by putting
specially-built packages (e.g. sdl-pulse, openal-pulse) into
[community] and grouping them in a "pulse" group.
This group would also include a "pulse-asoundrc" package containing a
pulse-configured asound.conf, as well as dependi
11 matches
Mail list logo
