On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Jan Steffens <jan.steff...@gmail.com> wrote: > I could make PulseAudio installation significantly easier by putting > specially-built packages (e.g. sdl-pulse, openal-pulse) into > [community] and grouping them in a "pulse" group. > > This group would also include a "pulse-asoundrc" package containing a > pulse-configured asound.conf, as well as depending on alsa-plugins. > > Should I go ahead with this? Any suggestions? >
I would suggest to apply for a jr. dev position so that the pulseaudio stuff could be moved to extra. That would save us from duplicating work by having both pulse and non-pulse packages. BTW, does adding pulse support make it a depends or optdepends? I would guess it depends on the package.
