Re: [arch-general] 1. Re: version control system for normal user (Magnus Therning)

2010-08-29 Thread Magnus Therning
On 28/08/10 16:21, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Aug 28, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Johannes Held wrote: >> git does really support my way of coding. BUT perhaps I've changed >> my style of >> coding to match git? Who knows. … > > The thing I think people have the most problems with is the fact that > git

Re: [arch-general] 1. Re: version control system for normal user (Magnus Therning)

2010-08-28 Thread Philipp Überbacher
Excerpts from C Anthony Risinger's message of 2010-08-28 17:21:21 +0200: > On Aug 28, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Johannes Held wrote: > > git does really support my way of coding. BUT perhaps I've changed > > my style of > > coding to match git? Who knows. … > > The thing I think people have the most prob

Re: [arch-general] 1. Re: version control system for normal user (Magnus Therning)

2010-08-28 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Aug 28, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Johannes Held wrote: > git does really support my way of coding. BUT perhaps I've changed > my style of > coding to match git? Who knows. … The thing I think people have the most problems with is the fact that git is less of a VCS itself, and more of a _toolkit_ to de

Re: [arch-general] 1. Re: version control system for normal user (Magnus Therning)

2010-08-28 Thread Johannes Held
Magnus Therning : > True, but I still don't quite understand the point of the staging area. > I've > never found a good use for it. In short, I don't think the staging area is > the feature that makes git a better option than Mercurial :-) If you use it, you'll need it. :) Short time ago, I didn'

Re: [arch-general] 1. Re: version control system for normal user (Magnus Therning)

2010-08-28 Thread Magnus Therning
On 28/08/10 11:45, Johannes Held wrote: > José M. Prieto : >> Git is very powerful, but not the easier one to use. I'd suggest darcs >> or mercurial better. > I used Darcs for a while and I liked its "theory of patches". But at some > point > I was just fed up with having to decide about every lin

Re: [arch-general] 1. Re: version control system for normal user (Magnus Therning)

2010-08-28 Thread Johannes Held
José M. Prieto : > Git is very powerful, but not the easier one to use. I'd suggest darcs > or mercurial better. I used Darcs for a while and I liked its "theory of patches". But at some point I was just fed up with having to decide about every line I changed. With Git, I can stage selected changes

Re: [arch-general] 1. Re: version control system for normal user (Magnus Therning)

2010-08-27 Thread José M . Prieto
2010/8/27 jewelshaw : > Nice to get your suggestions. I'd better try git, since many recommend. As > for svn, just "svnadmin create "a repository does work? > PS: Sorry for my stupidity. I'm new to mailing list, and don't know how to > reply a certain post. $ svnadmin create $HOME/repo $ svn co fi

Re: [arch-general] 1. Re: version control system for normal user (Magnus Therning)

2010-08-27 Thread Baho Utot
On 08/26/2010 10:51 PM, jewelshaw wrote: Nice to get your suggestions. I'd better try git, since many recommend. As for svn, just "svnadmin create "a repository does work? PS: Sorry for my stupidity. I'm new to mailing list, and don't know how to reply a certain post. Thank you all http://sv

[arch-general] 1. Re: version control system for normal user (Magnus Therning)

2010-08-26 Thread jewelshaw
Nice to get your suggestions. I'd better try git, since many recommend. As for svn, just "svnadmin create "a repository does work? PS: Sorry for my stupidity. I'm new to mailing list, and don't know how to reply a certain post. Thank you all 2010/8/27 > Send arch-general mailing list submission