Am Mittwoch 08 Dezember 2010 schrieb Heiko Baums:
> Am Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:56:24 -0500
>
> schrieb Dave Reisner :
> > 3) use Archboot, which supports a wider range of packages.
>
> But Archboot has some other disadvantages. It's not as flexible as
> Archiso and doesn't give me as many options as A
Am Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:56:24 -0500
schrieb Dave Reisner :
> 3) use Archboot, which supports a wider range of packages.
But Archboot has some other disadvantages. It's not as flexible as
Archiso and doesn't give me as many options as Archiso, e.g. I can't
change or control the cryptsetup options an
Am Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:56:24 -0500
schrieb Dave Reisner :
> I highly doubt that this was _ever_ a question of size in the repos.
> More likely, It's a matter of time vs. gain for a small number of
> volunteers. If you're a user who knows that they want a particular
> exotic filesystem that isn't wi
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:56:24 -0500
Dave Reisner wrote:
> I highly doubt that this was _ever_ a question of size in the repos.
> More likely, It's a matter of time vs. gain for a small number of
> volunteers. If you're a user who knows that they want a particular
> exotic filesystem that isn't wide
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:18:20AM -0200, Armando M. Baratti wrote:
> Em 08-12-2010 09:57, Heiko Baums escreveu:
> >Am Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:25:06 -0500
> >schrieb Loui Chang:
> >
> >So those packages are affected:
> >e2fsprogs
> >reiserfsprogs
> >btrfs-progs(-unstable)
> >nilfs-utils
> >jfsutils
> >x
Em 08-12-2010 09:57, Heiko Baums escreveu:
Am Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:25:06 -0500
schrieb Loui Chang:
So those packages are affected:
e2fsprogs
reiserfsprogs
btrfs-progs(-unstable)
nilfs-utils
jfsutils
xfsprogs
nfs-utils
package files
Am Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:45:50 -0500
schrieb Loui Chang :
> Ask Microsoft to support every filesystem in existence on their
> standard install CD and core system and maybe us poor Archers with
> our limited time and budget can also rise to your stratospheric
> expectations.
Microsoft has only two fi
Am Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:25:06 -0500
schrieb Loui Chang :
> I'm not so sure about that. There are probably more filesystems than I
> can imagine. I wouldn't be too thrilled if all of that was in core.
I only mean Linux filesystems which can be used for installing Linux,
whether they are or can be us
At Mittwoch, 8. Dezember 2010 05:45 Loui Chang wrote:
> Ask Microsoft to support every filesystem in existence on their standard
> install CD and core system and maybe us poor Archers with our limited
> time and budget can also rise to your stratospheric expectations.
Bad example because MS offer
On Tue 07 Dec 2010 18:30 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:26:00 +0100
> schrieb Pierre Schmitz :
>
> > I second this. If the reason for moving a package to core is that the
> > installer cannot handle it otherwise the installer needs to be fixed.
>
> The question is not that the
On Tue 07 Dec 2010 20:12 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:12:05 +0100
> schrieb Tobias Powalowski :
>
> > This is a proper solution without making core a big monster again.
> > greetings
>
> Adding all filesystem tools to [core] won't make it a big monster. ;-)
I'm not so sure a
Am Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:12:05 +0100
schrieb Tobias Powalowski :
> This is a proper solution without making core a big monster again.
> greetings
Adding all filesystem tools to [core] won't make it a big monster. ;-)
Heiko
Am Dienstag 07 Dezember 2010 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:30:03 +0100
>
> Heiko Baums wrote:
> > Also the netinstall iso can only install from [core] as
> > far as I know.
>
> not entirely correct, but that would be off-topic.
>
> > But on the other hand every filesystem re
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:30:03 +0100
Heiko Baums wrote:
> Also the netinstall iso can only install from [core] as
> far as I know.
not entirely correct, but that would be off-topic.
> But on the other hand every filesystem related package has to be
> removed from (base), while AIF should then be a
Am Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:26:00 +0100
schrieb Pierre Schmitz :
> I second this. If the reason for moving a package to core is that the
> installer cannot handle it otherwise the installer needs to be fixed.
The question is not that the installer can't handle it if it's not in
[core]. The question is
15 matches
Mail list logo
