Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] mkinitcpio 0.6 alpha - testing and help needed

2010-02-04 Thread Henning Garus
On Tue, 02.02.2010 um 19:13 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Bump! Virtually nobody has performed any testing (except the people I > poked about it). Also, I still don't have fixed raid or dmraid hooks, > nor any suggestion for implementing root on NFS (of the last three, I > use neither). I could wr

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] mkinitcpio 0.6 alpha - testing and help needed

2010-02-03 Thread Uli Armbruster
* Thomas Bächler [03.02.2010 11:12]: > Am 03.02.2010 10:32, schrieb Uli Armbruster: > > uresume is needed for uswsusp (from [community]) > > Good to know. This hook used glibc anyway, so there is no adjustment > needed to the new initramfs. Less work for me. > > > In the wiki, it says that all o

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] mkinitcpio 0.6 alpha - testing and help needed

2010-02-03 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 03.02.2010 13:52, schrieb Damjan Georgievski: >>> [kill-klibc] >>> Server = http://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/kill-klibc/i686/ > >> Bump! Virtually nobody has performed any testing (except the people I >> poked about it). > > If it matters to anyone, It does to me. > the new mkinitcpio also

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] mkinitcpio 0.6 alpha - testing and help needed

2010-02-03 Thread Damjan Georgievski
>> [kill-klibc] >> Server = http://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/kill-klibc/i686/ > Bump! Virtually nobody has performed any testing (except the people I > poked about it). If it matters to anyone, the new mkinitcpio also works just fine while resuming my TuxOnIce kernel, and I do use /dev/disk/by-uu

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] mkinitcpio 0.6 alpha - testing and help needed

2010-02-03 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 03.02.2010 10:32, schrieb Uli Armbruster: > uresume is needed for uswsusp (from [community]) Good to know. This hook used glibc anyway, so there is no adjustment needed to the new initramfs. Less work for me. > In the wiki, it says that all of these udev rules don't work, because > there's no

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] mkinitcpio 0.6 alpha - testing and help needed

2010-02-03 Thread Uli Armbruster
2010/2/2 Thomas Bächler : > Am 02.02.2010 22:51, schrieb Uli Armbruster: >> I use your kill-klibc repo on i686 and I just want to confirm, that it works >> with >> >> % cat /etc/mkinitcpio.conf >> MODULES="" >> HOOKS="base udev pata uresume filesystems" > > Just out of curiosity, where's the uresu

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] mkinitcpio 0.6 alpha - testing and help needed

2010-02-02 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 02.02.2010 22:51, schrieb Uli Armbruster: > I use your kill-klibc repo on i686 and I just want to confirm, that it works > with > > % cat /etc/mkinitcpio.conf > MODULES="" > HOOKS="base udev pata uresume filesystems" Just out of curiosity, where's the uresume hook from, which package? > No p

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] mkinitcpio 0.6 alpha - testing and help needed

2010-02-02 Thread Uli Armbruster
* Thomas Bächler [02.02.2010 19:13]: > Am 24.01.2010 18:05, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > > Quoted from http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17298 (which is also to be > > used for feedback, besides the threads on these mailing lists): > > > > So, now something can be tested. I recommend using it in conjun