Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-03 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Arvid Picciani wrote: > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: >> Maybe is related to this (not sure, I didn't a deep research) >> >> http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-4958 >> >> Under qt-4.5.3: >> $ ./qt >> point size: 10 -> 12.75 >> point size: 12 -> 15 >> >> But under qt-4.6.0: >> $ ./qt

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-03 Thread Arvid Picciani
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: Maybe is related to this (not sure, I didn't a deep research) http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-4958 Under qt-4.5.3: $ ./qt point size: 10 -> 12.75 point size: 12 -> 15 But under qt-4.6.0: $ ./qt point size: 10 -> 16.67 point size: 12 -> 20

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-03 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: > 2009/12/2 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi : > >>> De: Attila >>> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: >>> >>> Installed here (i686 at this moment). Font looks a bit >>> bigger than with >>> previus qt. >>> Do you have a vertical LCD d

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-02 Thread Attila
At Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009 10:51 Raghavendra Prabhu wrote: > Qt 4.6 works fine for me And you you have a vertical LCD? But no problem if not because this sounds nice and i hope it will give KDE some speedup. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-02 Thread Attila
At Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009 16:15 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > No 19" CRT monitor 1280x1024 @ 96x96 DPI + nvidia 190.42. Oh, sorry for the question.-) > Seems that is the forum topic is unrelated, talks about font curruption. Here fonts are OK, the only difference is that are a bit bigger

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-02 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
2009/12/2 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi : >> De: Attila >> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: >> >> > Installed here (i686 at this moment). Font looks a bit >> bigger than with >> > previus qt. >> >> Do you have a vertical LCD display perhaps? I ask because >> of this elder >> discussion about problems in qt

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-02 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
> De: Attila > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > > > Installed here (i686 at this moment). Font looks a bit > bigger than with > > previus qt. > > Do you have a vertical LCD display perhaps? I ask because > of this elder > discussion about problems in qt 4.5.0 with fonts and > certain monitors: >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-02 Thread Raghavendra Prabhu
Qt 4.6 works fine for me (the one i got from here https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre/packages/x86_64/ ) On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Attila wrote: > At Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009 05:03 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > > > Installed h

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-01 Thread Attila
At Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009 05:03 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Installed here (i686 at this moment). Font looks a bit bigger than with > previus qt. Do you have a vertical LCD display perhaps? I ask because of this elder discussion about problems in qt 4.5.0 with fonts and certain monitors:

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-01 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Hi there, > > I am still not sure if we can move Qt 4.6 to [testing] or even [extra]. In > theory it should be comptabile with all previous 4.x releases but my > experience tells me that there might be broken things. > > So it would be nice if you have a look at my package