On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 07:27:29PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> As most devs have done already, I'm going to change my relationship
> with arch-general. This probably does not matter to most of you, so
> sorry for the noise. Then again, it might be a useful reminder about
> how most
Another signoff from x86_64.
On 01/05/2012 10:26 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Please, someone give me a cent for every time this question is asked.
If I ever go to Germany, I'll buy you enough beers to last you through
the night. :P
On 10/04/2011 09:19 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches
Changes:
- changed default governor to ondemand instead of performance
- added ubifs support
- reworked archlinux MTD session based on fedora
# enable rico XD card reader support:
https://
On 08/18/2011 12:12 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches
greetings
tpowa
Signoff x86_64.
On 06/15/2011 05:03 AM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
anyone got problems with texlive 2011 usage so far?
No problem here so far. But I didn't test all of TeXLive packages, just
the ones that I used.
On 02/23/2011 07:31 PM, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 17:43, Smith Dhumbumroong wrote:
No sign off from me (x86_64).
After I upgrade to the latest util-linux package from testing (version
2.19-3), I can no longer unmount FUSE file system because FUSE file system
won't show
On 02/22/2011 08:41 PM, Uli Armbruster wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 02/22/2011 02:13 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 22.02.2011 12:35, schrieb Ionuț Bîru:
Hi,
The util-linux-ng project has been renamed back to util-linux.
Why 2.19-3? Shouldn't it be -1?
be
On 08/17/2010 02:50 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Good point on power consumption. I'll see if I can find powertop in
AUR. The instrumentation on my laptop sucks - few sensors, but my best
sensors are my hands. The CPU and GPU are located in the left side of
my laptop and you can feel the temp ch
On 08/07/2010 01:05 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 2.6.35 series for both arches
and give feedback if
real issues arise.
Upstream
changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
greetings
tpowa
I have been using kernel26 package version 2.6.35-2 for about a day now.
No
On 07/29/2010 09:36 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Caleb Cushing wrote:
how embarrassing.
I guess cooker is like their testing version... but according to this
it's in opensuse 11.3... we're definitely starting to fall behind
release distro's here.
Since when did
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:24:30AM -0500, andrew james wrote:
> i think I am soon tired of thunderbird 3.. I could revert to vers 2
> but why is the newer vers slow, laggy, semi-stallish?
>
> has anyone else a funky thunderbird vers 3? any switch values to
> cause it to work quicker?
>
> altern
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:03:53 +0100
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Montag 07 Dezember 2009 schrieb Tom:
> > So, any news on this?
> > I 'fixed' it by removing radeon from initramfs, but as has been
> > pointed out, thats not really a solution!?
> >
> HI guys,
> This kms firmware issue revealed a b
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:33:12 +0100
Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 08.12.2009 11:13, Xavier wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:52 AM, David C. Rankin
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Monday 07 December 2009 09:05:18 and regarding:
> >>
> >>> I'm confirming this as well. Mine fails at radeon/R200_c
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:07:24 +0100
Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Arvid Picciani wrote:
> > Sounds like either this discussion is worth discussing again.
>
> i forgot to add: "or you're a rare exception, Jan."
> thanks for at least trying to see the point here, much aprechiated.
> i hope others follow
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:58:20 +0100
Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Jan de Groot wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 19:45 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> >> nope. The hal crap has been added to X a while ago as "optional"
> >> (meaning X would just freeze without it, but at least pretend to
> >> start)
> >
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:11:02 -0700
Sergey Manucharian wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The similar question most probably has been discussed many times, but
> I really cannot find a clear answer. There are some obvious thinks
> like 64-bit addressing, but how about math calculations performance?
>
> I've
me engine than the driver it self
(I might be wrong, though).
Regards,
Smith Dhumbumroong
Thank you for taking your time and updating the scim packages, Eric. :)
Any news on when it will hit 64bit? I'm currently using scim on my
x86_64 Arch and would like to test the new packages out.
19 matches
Mail list logo
